lichess.org
Donate

Why is this an inaccuracy and not a blunder?

I played Bxf1, and it labeled it an inaccuracy, but there is a 4+ point difference compared with Ng4. So why isn't it a blunder?

https://i.imgur.com/Q9OXKDg.jpg
Yeah, Stockfish is like that. In winning position, just because i missed mate in 1-10, it gave me inaccuracy
it is not even inaccuracy. totally pointless difference. correct move in such a situation is not best-by-computer but one that you can see that maintains the win
the stokfish lies yo it says incurries for blunder too

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.