I have a complaint about how an unidentified lichess forum actor (moderator, with some extreme decision making impulses, perhaps).
my first take on bringing the legitimate question to the forum, was aborted, without any communication with me, i don't know how fast, only that i wrote the post 2 days. ago.
I suspect, diagonal reading technique, or poor exposure to text that does not use emoji punctuation for transmitting the tone underlying a given sentence.
i leave you with a taste, of why a some meta information was lost somewhere.
the link to the post, attempting to use absurdity as discussion device, right from the start.
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/how-many-humans-does-it-take-to-screw-a-light-bulb ?
i should have left some trace of my many associated questions, and initial hypotheses, instead of leaving only the irony, i did not want to put all my ideas at the start, to let fresh, hypotheses, from unrelated threads of life add to the pool of suggestions.
a rare exercise in self restraint from my part, actually pushing me to keep erring on the side of too much redundancy in fear of being misunderstood. The ease of cut and paste, when fatigue starts showing, up , and voila, i appear having just wanted to spam some unrelated comedy, in a chess forum. at the expense of the community.
or the person had a fuse already loose, before reading the post, and jumped at the opportunity to act out some unrelated issues
anybody else, here would read that, and agree that the thread should be canceled, less than two days, after 1 post?
or that a verification of intent should have been first attempted.... or that the person had a little need for bureaucratic demonstration of arbitrary power,
perhaps having his humor muscle completely numbed by the chore of forum moderation, that he resorts to automatic pilot reading. are the moderators being strained...
i hope that the mere thought of considering some measure of cooperative behavior in a well established tradition of exclusive competition is not a problem, i doubt, it. so far, the more i interact with other chess players, the more i think that curiosity is a common trait. but we are not one dimensional characters in an opinionated, TV series canvas...
my first take on bringing the legitimate question to the forum, was aborted, without any communication with me, i don't know how fast, only that i wrote the post 2 days. ago.
I suspect, diagonal reading technique, or poor exposure to text that does not use emoji punctuation for transmitting the tone underlying a given sentence.
i leave you with a taste, of why a some meta information was lost somewhere.
the link to the post, attempting to use absurdity as discussion device, right from the start.
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/how-many-humans-does-it-take-to-screw-a-light-bulb ?
i should have left some trace of my many associated questions, and initial hypotheses, instead of leaving only the irony, i did not want to put all my ideas at the start, to let fresh, hypotheses, from unrelated threads of life add to the pool of suggestions.
a rare exercise in self restraint from my part, actually pushing me to keep erring on the side of too much redundancy in fear of being misunderstood. The ease of cut and paste, when fatigue starts showing, up , and voila, i appear having just wanted to spam some unrelated comedy, in a chess forum. at the expense of the community.
or the person had a fuse already loose, before reading the post, and jumped at the opportunity to act out some unrelated issues
anybody else, here would read that, and agree that the thread should be canceled, less than two days, after 1 post?
or that a verification of intent should have been first attempted.... or that the person had a little need for bureaucratic demonstration of arbitrary power,
perhaps having his humor muscle completely numbed by the chore of forum moderation, that he resorts to automatic pilot reading. are the moderators being strained...
i hope that the mere thought of considering some measure of cooperative behavior in a well established tradition of exclusive competition is not a problem, i doubt, it. so far, the more i interact with other chess players, the more i think that curiosity is a common trait. but we are not one dimensional characters in an opinionated, TV series canvas...