Woodpecker - bad numbering

This is not really a "bug" but I signal it: in the Woodpecker section "Intermediate 4" the numbering of exercises is said to be "Exercices #415 to #487" but really it is FROM #415 TO #478. I repeat: up to 478 instead of 487.

The next section, Intermediate 5, is aldo affected by the error as it is said to start from #488 whilst it should start from 479.

@Mabor said in #1:

This is not really a "bug" but I signal it: in the Woodpecker section "Intermediate 4" the numbering of exercises is said to be "Exercices #415 to #487" but really it is FROM #415 TO #478. I repeat: up to 478 instead of 487.

The next section, Intermediate 5, is aldo affected by the error as it is said to start from #488 whilst it should start from 479.
What does this have to do with lichess tho...?

@DERG_CHESS said in #2:

What does this have to do with lichess tho...?

Here is the answer to your kind question.

1. Lichess hosts the Woodpecker method;
2. This is done in dedicated sections of Lichess (if you look for "Woodpecker" you'll find it);
3. One of these sections (the Intermediate 4 as I said) presents the error I mentioned;
4. The numbering errors also affects the next sections.

@Mabor
That is not run by liches it's a study on lichess made by
https://lichess.org/@/carbone144

so you must ask him to fix it
(if we are talking about the same guy if not please provide link)

@Mabor As written above, you seem to talk about "STUDIES" (https://lichess.org/study / https://lichess.org/study/search?q=woodpecker).

Studies can be shared by EVERY registered user on Lichess and there is no "quality assurance" on it. There are thousands of them with all different levels of quality or correctness. The only "official" host of the Woodpecker Method (online) is Chessable, afaik.

So, of course you can ask the study's owner to change it for you, but i'd think that will not happen in most cases.

In the end you have to take what you get or create your own study (on the Woodpecker, for example) on your personal wishes.

Have fun anyway!

Hello, I had a problem with some exercices. Some were missing, and that's why there are the 415 to 487 instead of 478, it's because 8 or 9 of them are missing. When I saw that too late, i couldn't add them between the others because of the displacement of all the others.

BUT i added the missing exercices at the end of the last part medium 12/12 :

But the studies are not accessible, I am on 6th part of intermediate, and this study is very much convenient than studying book
@carbone144 Please make it public again

I can see the message study not found or study is private

@carbone144 said in #8:

Hello, I had a problem with some exercices. Some were missing, and that's why there are the 415 to 487 instead of 478, it's because 8 or 9 of them are missing. When I saw that too late, i couldn't add them between the others because of the displacement of all the others.

BUT i added the missing exercices at the end of the last part medium 12/12 :

Ok, thanks to all for the explanations. And above all thanks to carbone144: the woodpecker requires lot of engagement but is very useful and I suggest it to everyone