Over 6K games played and no chetating detected. In chess.com (free) they detect and find this kind of abuses...
Is this an ad for chess.com/?
@Morobiondo said in #1:
> Over 6K games played and no chetating detected. In chess.com (free) they detect and find this kind of abuses...
You're saying you cheated?
> Over 6K games played and no chetating detected. In chess.com (free) they detect and find this kind of abuses...
You're saying you cheated?
@Overcooker said in #2:
> Is this an ad for chess.com/?
No affiliation whatsoever. Just my comparison playing on both platforms.
> Is this an ad for chess.com/?
No affiliation whatsoever. Just my comparison playing on both platforms.
@AsDaGo said in #3:
> You're saying you cheated?
No, I never did. But I am sure there is this problem (at any level)
> You're saying you cheated?
No, I never did. But I am sure there is this problem (at any level)
@Morobiondo said in #4:
> No affiliation whatsoever. Just my comparison playing on both platforms.
Are you sure this is not an ad? Why do you need to point out that chess.com is free?
> No affiliation whatsoever. Just my comparison playing on both platforms.
Are you sure this is not an ad? Why do you need to point out that chess.com is free?
He's not pointing out that chesscom is free, because it's not, but that he's on the free plan.
Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
@Overcooker said in #6:
> Are you sure this is not an ad? Why do you need to point out that chess.com is free?
I already answered to you above, I do not need your permission to write or point out
what I like . Not only lichess is free.
> Are you sure this is not an ad? Why do you need to point out that chess.com is free?
I already answered to you above, I do not need your permission to write or point out
what I like . Not only lichess is free.
@Deadban said in #7:
> He's not pointing out that chesscom is free, because it's not, but that he's on the free plan.
>
> Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
>
> He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
>
> If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
My thoughts exactly, especially no disrespect intended.
> He's not pointing out that chesscom is free, because it's not, but that he's on the free plan.
>
> Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
>
> He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
>
> If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
My thoughts exactly, especially no disrespect intended.
@Deadban said in #7:
> He's not pointing out that chesscom is free, because it's not, but that he's on the free plan.
>
> Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
>
> He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
>
> If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
Hey, do not fool around, has lichess checks on cheating? Yes or not?
> He's not pointing out that chesscom is free, because it's not, but that he's on the free plan.
>
> Then he is saying that in chesscom sometimes he receives refunds for cheaters while in Lichess he is not.
>
> He gives me the vibe of someone who never reports anyone but somehow expects refunds for cheaters he faced but was not confident enough or didn't care to report to moderation.
>
> If instead he is actually reporting, in this case I would not expect a 1100 blitz rated to be able to spot that many cheaters. No disrespect meant of course.
Hey, do not fool around, has lichess checks on cheating? Yes or not?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.