@Diego-Alexander It's hyperbullet not ultrabullet and you played really well, I don't know the answer of the title but maybe google can! Well, Andrew tang have beated stockfish 1-8 in ultrabullet!
@Rudra-Chess It was ultrabullet in the pawn finals and is where he tricked me
@Diego-Alexander Ohk, but the format is hyper so doesn't matter it's hyper or ultra coz all the theorys and else are finished
maybe it simple didn't have too many options to calculate
@Diego-Alexander
Check the 'move times' in the computer analysis section of the game.
You will see that Stockfish played very fast and took a maximum of 0.4 seconds to play a move while you took maximum of 2.1 seconds to play a move.
Well, if you play a 1/2+0 (hyperbullet) game with all Stockfish levels, you will notice that Stockfish 1 plays the quickest though the worst as it played many mistakes in the game.
It really 'tricked' you, but I can see that you had 7 seconds, and that's enough (as I think) time to win this endgame properly. Also you are a 2000+ rated player.
Try again and beat Stockfish level 1 in hyperbullet. Then next levels.
I am always away from these things as I don't like so slow time controls which are less than 1+0.
Check the 'move times' in the computer analysis section of the game.
You will see that Stockfish played very fast and took a maximum of 0.4 seconds to play a move while you took maximum of 2.1 seconds to play a move.
Well, if you play a 1/2+0 (hyperbullet) game with all Stockfish levels, you will notice that Stockfish 1 plays the quickest though the worst as it played many mistakes in the game.
It really 'tricked' you, but I can see that you had 7 seconds, and that's enough (as I think) time to win this endgame properly. Also you are a 2000+ rated player.
Try again and beat Stockfish level 1 in hyperbullet. Then next levels.
I am always away from these things as I don't like so slow time controls which are less than 1+0.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.