Short game: What really went wrong?

https://lichess.org/5B4L2t3c/black

The following are the problem areas by rating value of the black moves.

... ?! 2080
... ? 919
... ?! 2981
...?! 2208
...?! 689

The following are the problem areas by rating value of the black moves. 5. ... ?! 2080 6. ... ? 919 7. ... ?! 2981 10. ...?! 2208 17. ...?! 689

Toscani

Summary after evaluating pasting it in the Lucas Chess GUI.
Average lost scores : White 0.25 pws vs Black 17.64 pws = Total Game 8.95 pws
Domination : White 74.29% vs Black 0.0% = Game Nil
Complexity : Moderate (20.80%) vs Moderate (18.79%) = Game Moderate (19.79%)
Efficient mobility : White Low (11.52%) vs Black Moderate (18.62%) = Game Moderate (15.07%)
Narrowness : White Moderate (30.95%) vs Black Very high (58.01%) = Game High (44.48%)
Pieces activity : White Moderate (16.00%) vs Black Low (13.00%) = Game Low (14.50%)
Exchange tendency : White Low (6.88%) vs Black Moderate (21.67%) = Game Low (14.27%)
Percentage : White 85.17% vs Black 51.18% = Game 68.66%

VALUE _____... | White | Black | Total Elo performance
Rating ___....| 3274 | 2068 | 2671
Opening ____... | 3294 | 3300 | 3297
Middle game ...| 3272 | 2024 | 2648

16 good moves in the game and black did 6 of them.

I think the ratings are not the same as lichess ratings.

Summary after evaluating pasting it in the Lucas Chess GUI. Average lost scores : White 0.25 pws vs Black 17.64 pws = Total Game 8.95 pws Domination : White 74.29% vs Black 0.0% = Game Nil Complexity : Moderate (20.80%) vs Moderate (18.79%) = Game Moderate (19.79%) Efficient mobility : White Low (11.52%) vs Black Moderate (18.62%) = Game Moderate (15.07%) Narrowness : White Moderate (30.95%) vs Black Very high (58.01%) = Game High (44.48%) Pieces activity : White Moderate (16.00%) vs Black Low (13.00%) = Game Low (14.50%) Exchange tendency : White Low (6.88%) vs Black Moderate (21.67%) = Game Low (14.27%) Percentage : White 85.17% vs Black 51.18% = Game 68.66% VALUE _____... | White | Black | Total Elo performance Rating ______....| 3274 | 2068 | 2671 Opening ____... | 3294 | 3300 | 3297 Middle game ...| 3272 | 2024 | 2648 16 good moves in the game and black did 6 of them. I think the ratings are not the same as lichess ratings.

J_SEDA_conant

How’s about you share where you getting your numbers and then someone might understand enough to help

Toscani

edited

@J_SEDA_conant Too bad you did not read this ...Summary after evaluating pasting it in the Lucas Chess GUI.

That means the numbers came from that GUI.
In the future if you cannot help, don't respond with a comment like you did.

Read, you might learn something new.
I even pointed out the moves that needed improvement.

The opponent played outstandingly. Zero centipawn loss. I did 2 blunders. The last one does not matter. It was a lost game.

@J_SEDA_conant Too bad you did not read this ...Summary after evaluating pasting it in the Lucas Chess GUI. That means the numbers came from that GUI. In the future if you cannot help, don't respond with a comment like you did. Read, you might learn something new. I even pointed out the moves that needed improvement. The opponent played outstandingly. Zero centipawn loss. I did 2 blunders. The last one does not matter. It was a lost game.

J_SEDA_conant

@Toscani said in #5:

Read, you might learn something.
I did read... and didn’t understand. Also I am helping by suggesting you should explain what everything means

@Toscani said in #5: > Read, you might learn something. I did read... and didn’t understand. Also I am helping by suggesting you should explain what everything means

Toscani

Move six is the worst blunder of the game. If I took the pawn, the opponent would have exchanged Queens and my king would be at a disadvantage by moving to recapture.
So the true error is really move 5.
The rest just fell like dominos.

https://www.chesscompass.com/analyze/444537301c05704b4fcf9927fb2762f7

Move six is the worst blunder of the game. If I took the pawn, the opponent would have exchanged Queens and my king would be at a disadvantage by moving to recapture. So the true error is really move 5. The rest just fell like dominos. https://www.chesscompass.com/analyze/444537301c05704b4fcf9927fb2762f7

ColdTehran edited

What went wrong is you played waaay too fast.

Your opponent also played way too fast, but they actually played good moves lol. That's how it goes in bullet, not much use in analysing it IMO.

What went wrong is you played waaay too fast. Your opponent also played way too fast, but they actually played good moves lol. That's how it goes in bullet, not much use in analysing it IMO.

ShiningDrongo

You could have played 2...d5 like a normal person

Toscani

#10

" ... like a normal person. " @ShiningDrongo
Why the rudeness ? Your end statement is not normal, it's toxic. It's insulting all the players that have played that move.
Pick your words wisely.

The B10 Caro-Kann Defense ... Nothing wrong with my second move.
It's in the master database.

https://lichess.org/dlIJafzl/black

Feature request: I just realised that this topic is in the feedback forum. It should have been in the analysis forum. Too bad there is no way of relocating it in the correct forum section.

As a temporary solution, the topic should be closed by the mods. There is nothing to gain from leaving it open.

" ... like a normal person. " @ShiningDrongo Why the rudeness ? Your end statement is not normal, it's toxic. It's insulting all the players that have played that move. Pick your words wisely. The B10 Caro-Kann Defense ... Nothing wrong with my second move. It's in the master database. https://lichess.org/dlIJafzl/black Feature request: I just realised that this topic is in the feedback forum. It should have been in the analysis forum. Too bad there is no way of relocating it in the correct forum section. As a temporary solution, the topic should be closed by the mods. There is nothing to gain from leaving it open.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.