technically Knights are goated but are not exactly better then bishops

In chess, neither is always better — it depends on the position.
But here’s the simple breakdown:

Knights are better when:

The position is closed (lots of pawns blocking the board)

There are many outposts (strong squares the knight can sit on)

You can create forks

The knight can jump around where bishops can’t move

Bishops are better when:

The position is open (few pawns, lots of diagonals)

You have a bishop pair (two bishops together are extremely strong)

Your bishop becomes very active

Endgames where the bishop controls long distances

Quick rule:

Closed game Knight is slightly better

Open game Bishop is slightly better

Overall:

Most grandmasters say a bishop is slightly more valuable on average, but a knight can be more dangerous tactically.

@NekoNight123 said in #1:

In chess, neither is always better — it depends on the position.
But here’s the simple breakdown:

Knights are better when:

The position is closed (lots of pawns blocking the board)

There are many outposts (strong squares the knight can sit on)

You can create forks

The knight can jump around where bishops can’t move

Bishops are better when:

The position is open (few pawns, lots of diagonals)

You have a bishop pair (two bishops together are extremely strong)

Your bishop becomes very active

Endgames where the bishop controls long distances

Quick rule:

Closed game Knight is slightly better

Open game Bishop is slightly better

Overall:

Most grandmasters say a bishop is slightly more valuable on average, but a knight can be more dangerous tactically.

Thinking
Putting it all together
The statement that "knights are better than bishops" touches upon one of the most enduring and fascinating debates in chess strategy. The truth is that
neither piece is universally superior; their strength is entirely dependent on the specific position on the board, a nuanced concept that masters and engines alike analyze deeply.
At the most basic level of material value, both a knight and a bishop are typically valued at around three pawns. However, this simple numerical value masks a world of positional considerations where one piece can become significantly more powerful than the other. The key distinction lies in how the board is structured, particularly the pawn setup and the number of other pieces remaining.
Here is a detailed explanation of when a knight might be better, and when the bishop excels, providing context to your assertion.
When Knights Reign Supreme
Knights are, in essence, the masters of close-quarters combat and tricky maneuvers. Their unique ability to jump over other pieces makes them incredibly valuable in certain situations.

Closed Positions: The primary domain of the knight is a "closed" or "pawn-clogged" position, where many pawns are locked together, restricting the long-range movement of bishops and rooks. The knight can simply hop over these blockades to find active squares.
Central Outposts: A knight becomes a true monster, sometimes referred to as an "octopus knight," when it is placed on an advanced square in the center (ideally on the fifth or sixth rank) where it cannot be attacked or driven away by enemy pawns. From such a stable outpost, it can control a wide range of important squares and pose a constant, annoying threat to the opponent's position.
Forks and Tactics: The L-shaped move of the knight can be difficult for human players to anticipate, making it the undisputed master of the fork (attacking two or more pieces simultaneously). This tactical potential gives the knight an advantage, especially in faster time controls like blitz or bullet chess, or against less experienced players who may miss these surprising threats.
Endgames with Pawns on One Side: In endgames where all the remaining pawns are clustered on a single side of the board, the knight is often superior. Its ability to access both white and black squares is a major advantage, as the bishop is forever limited to just one color complex.

When Bishops Take the Lead
Conversely, bishops are powerful long-range pieces, functioning best with open lines of sight, much like an archer.

Open Positions: As pieces and pawns are traded and the board "opens up," bishops gain immense power. A bishop on a long, open diagonal can control a huge swath of the board (up to 14 squares from the center), rapidly moving from one side to the other to defend or attack. A knight would take multiple moves to cover the same distance.
The Bishop Pair Advantage: Having both bishops is considered a significant strategic asset (often valued at an extra half-pawn) because, together, they cover all the squares on the board. This synergistic coverage often dominates a lone bishop and knight, or two knights, in the late middlegame and endgame.
Endgames with Pawns on Both Sides: If pawns are scattered across both flanks of the board, the bishop's long reach allows it to influence the battle on both sides simultaneously, a task that is slow and difficult for the short-ranged knight.
Mating Potential: While a king and single knight cannot force checkmate against a lone king, a king and single bishop can sometimes achieve this, and the checkmate with a king and two bishops is relatively straightforward to force, unlike with two knights.

Summary of the Great Debate
Ultimately, the choice between a knight and a bishop is a cornerstone of chess strategy. The value of each piece is fluid and dynamic, shifting with the ebb and flow of the game. If you prefer the tactical chaos of a crowded board and sneaky forks, you might favor the knight. If you prefer the long-term strategic advantage of the open board and sweeping diagonals, the bishop is your piece.
The general consensus among high-level players and powerful chess engines is that the bishop is very slightly stronger in a typical game, mainly due to the long-term potential of the bishop pair and the tendency for positions to open up as the game progresses. However, this small theoretical edge is irrelevant compared to the specific demands of the position at hand.
We've covered the general principles, but the best way to understand this truly is through practice. I can analyze a specific game position for you, perhaps one where you had to decide between keeping a knight or a bishop, and diagnose which minor piece was truly stronger and why