I Do As Much I Can, I Don`t See Any Proceed, Help?

Well, @circle_VIII is likely to become my first GM student :) Generally when you give advice, which you should never do by the way, it is less than 1% inspiration from the giver and more than 99% perspiration from the taker. If all that perspiration amounted to learning the way I would learn a foreign song in a language I don't speak at all, then surely not much chess improvement could be expected (assuming again that one type of learning can remain isolated from another in the brain, which in fact it cannot). It is however my recommendation to use a real board when possible, so I expect quite multidimensional learning. And, to repeat myself one last time for today, I expect the whole exercise to be an eye opener for a student's relationship to the game. I firmly believe people can be happy, and this also means happy unable to improve at chess. It is a belief that will be tested when I return to the board to get IM myself :) Reading a book, in this case reading ONE book and in fact reading THE book, with specific objectives can help you reevaluate your whole approach to objectives, chess, books, time and life. Amen hallelujah!

Lev Psakhis became USSR champion and said he got a boost in playing strength by memorizing all of Fischer's games...

I don't give anything to all those myths. One became good by taking a short-cut...

You have to gather some tens of thousands of chess chunks either way. Years (better: decades) of learning new stuff and practicing. Expose your brain to quality chess content and let it compose everything.

It does not take decades to become good: otherwise we would not see any 13 year old grandmasters like Karjakin.
Back on topic, the book and tournament is of 1953. An excellent book is Kasparov's book on his matches against Karpov. For those who think the 1953 tournament book is too massive, I recommend to play through Smyslov's games only.

This thread turned into a pissing contest of who can give the better advice.

While memorizing a book such as "The Amateurs Mind" would be useless (bc its more about understanding the CONCEPT of imbalances) memorizing books such as "100 End games you must know" Or "Silman's Complete end game course" COULD be useful. It depends on the content you are memorizing. Trying to commit opening lines to memory is useless for beginners however memorizing end game positions such as the Lucerna position IS useful.

@Sarg0n memorizing a massive tournament is a shortcut? Anyway, reading a modern book like “Chess Structures” does offer thousands of chess chunks, and who can say weak players cannot learn from it just like several GMs have said they learned from it? It just so happens that I prefer a tournament book, THE tournament book, because it gives a more complete picture of the chess struggle than Mauricio’s.

As an aside, I have to agree chess mastery includes numerous “chess chunks”, but at the 1400 level even a keen eye for two-move tactics should lift you up. My thesis is that tactical vision is not composed of chess chunks coaches usually teach (aim for the two bishops, get a good central square for the knight, if you lack space exchange pieces), but instead depends on a “neural repository” of much more varied/random patterns, and trying to build this neural repository after the age of six is an uphill struggle, but building long term chess memories is a powerful tool.

If our tactical rating is way ahead of our play rating, then would it not be the strategy side of chess that we are lacking?
The short term tactical rating verse the long term strategic plans.
If we don't practice something we don't get better at it.

Is there a book (give ISBN number so we can search the web) that tests our strategy, not our tactics ?

There is no strategy, just deeper tactics, sorry to break the news :)

@Agadmator should buy and analyze that Zurich 1953 book and create a series on it for us lazy players who have no time to read a book, also i have heard Danil Dubov say that he has memorized Kasparov all predecessors books and they help him a lot and infact chessbase india showed him a couple of positions and he instantly mentioned which games was it and the ideas and plans

@Cetrion you are referring to top level chess, where indeed everybody has memorized everything, there are a few elite players who say they haven’t but they are lying :) What I am hinting at is the possibility of “stuck” players to get unstuck with so called deliberate memory practice. I will probably do the 1953 videos next year, it is the 3rd item on my FT.NET agenda, meanwhile you can always buy the book and ship it to Agad :)