@FantasticTricks at least you had the guts to try it, and the guts to post it too
@TGBM95 yes I tried various opening in my games and it is casual game so why not try out a Latvian gambit .. But I did not thought that a 1300 rated player will play perfect moves in the opening and crushed me ... But I guess he is very happy with his win so when I asked for a serious rematch he just declined ... Nevertheless have to say that my opponent played well ...
So this whole game was a blunder. Don't even know what I was thinking since when I did the "learn from your mistakes" in the analysis board I made what stockfish considered the right move.
Resign at equal position lol really not see Nxe7
Cracking like an egg in an apparently defensible position. Stockfish suggests that Re3, protecting the knight, allows me to continue suffering indefinitely at -0.5 or -1.0.
Instead 18.Rd1??? Qxf3 -- the pawn is pinned and cannot recapture -- is now a mate in five, with great pressure exerted on the g-/f-pawns.
(18. Rd1??? Qxf3 19. Kf1 Rxg2 etc.)
In this game I tried to do the London system but made a ton of blunders like 18.rook to d1 etc...(it was a blitz game)but eventually I defeated the opponent with check mate
Don't ask why I did that, I just wasn't thinking properly
Ba4??? allowing immediate mate from the knight and queen.
In this game I think I overevaluated my queenside position, since I was quite happy to have opened the b-file with 12...Bxc3+ 13.bxa3. I should also have resolved the position with a queen trade before castling (16...Qd2+ 17.Qd2 Qxd2+ 18.Nxd2). It also seems very much fine to keep my king in the centre with plans of Rf8 and breaking with the f-pawn.
I've also got this simple queen hang fresh off the press, though that doesn't meet my own standards of interest.
I paniced lichess.org/soi7Spxc/black#78
No comment.......
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.