*SPOILER ALERT: If you want the opportunity of finding the tactic on move 25. then don't read on.*
In the Analysis board SF moves 26, 27 and 28 are the exactly the same as the moves you played when you found the tactic on 25. The moves you play and the moves SF recommend diverge on move 29. c5?! played by you and fxe5 recommended by SF. Unfortunately your opponent blunders on move 29...exf4 and so it may not be immediately obvious that the line you choose may not have been best. If you take more care you can see that the SF suggested line leads to a win while the move you played allows Black to coordinate his/her Kingside pawns. If you follow along the moves suggested (before Black blunders on 29...) you may find as I did in one of the computer recommended variations suggested instead of 29...exf4 - that white ends up in zugzwang and is forced to attack the Black rook (otherwise its a draw or worse) which frees the Black rook. The position that your *tactic* on move 29 leads to with best play is
en.lichess.org/analysis/8/p2k4/r5p1/1PP2p1p/5P1P/1K2R1P1/8/8_b_-_-while the position the computer suggested variation leads to after *stupidly pawn grabbing* is here
en.lichess.org/analysis/8/4kp2/r5p1/p1PRP3/P1PK3P/8/7P/8_w_-_-Now I think its clear that both positions are winning but I would like to see you argue that the *human* variation is a better position than the *SF suggested* one, because it seems the other way to me. Therefore I find it more likely that SF found your *tactic* evaluated it to be inferior for reasons that you did not foresee and decided to play something more accurate.
This is not to say that your tactic was not very good play but I don't think you have shown that it was superior to the SF moves, if you can please do. More worryingly, it seems that you really did not look very carefully into the analysis, saw that your move was *winning* and that SF did not play it and concluded that humans>SF FTW. I am all for Humans>SF, maybe one day, but I don't believe that arguing inaccurately is going to help anyone.
If I have made a mistake or you can show that the move you played was superior objectively, then I would genuinely like to see it.
Cheers!