@GLSmyth said in #19:
> I think you see my point. The study is not for Masters, it is for club players. Statistics in the Masters database have no relevance in this situation.
Studying is for improving, And as you see, the better you get, The more useless becomes.
> Studying the opening may be a waste of time for you, but apparently not for your opponents, who have a winning record against you when playing it. I would offer that as evidence that there just might be something there for those who do study it.
I stopped studying 20 years ago. When you use me as a measure stick, you have gone wrong already.
You are the one not getting the point. People who have been around for a long time are giving you advice so you dont follow their mistakes and actually improve.
> I think you see my point. The study is not for Masters, it is for club players. Statistics in the Masters database have no relevance in this situation.
Studying is for improving, And as you see, the better you get, The more useless becomes.
> Studying the opening may be a waste of time for you, but apparently not for your opponents, who have a winning record against you when playing it. I would offer that as evidence that there just might be something there for those who do study it.
I stopped studying 20 years ago. When you use me as a measure stick, you have gone wrong already.
You are the one not getting the point. People who have been around for a long time are giving you advice so you dont follow their mistakes and actually improve.