@spindriftdrinker said in #20:
> @Karlito_El_AZT3CO I would think that ancient Egyptian would be a tougher language to learn than ancient Phoenician, since ancient Phoenician is relatively close to ancient Hebrew, a very well-understood language with an alphabet. Reading hieroglyphics fluently sounds tough. I could be wrong, just a guess.
what is interesting about hieroglyphs is that they mix symbolic and phonetic meanings. and unless I'm mistaken, few modern languages have reached a graphic level like that of hieroglyphics (even if I'm thinking now about Asian languages)
I would nevertheless be interested to know if the symbolic signs engraved on the menhirs of Locmariaquer and in Bretagne can be considered as a primitive form of glyphs
> @Karlito_El_AZT3CO I would think that ancient Egyptian would be a tougher language to learn than ancient Phoenician, since ancient Phoenician is relatively close to ancient Hebrew, a very well-understood language with an alphabet. Reading hieroglyphics fluently sounds tough. I could be wrong, just a guess.
what is interesting about hieroglyphs is that they mix symbolic and phonetic meanings. and unless I'm mistaken, few modern languages have reached a graphic level like that of hieroglyphics (even if I'm thinking now about Asian languages)
I would nevertheless be interested to know if the symbolic signs engraved on the menhirs of Locmariaquer and in Bretagne can be considered as a primitive form of glyphs