The draw are often the most damning evidence. This game goes 103 plies with an average centipawn drop of 0.075 pawn loss per move according to the computer from both sides: lichess.org/3M5BRFHy#103
@WeirdAl
It's funny that you should use this example as I myself thought that my opponent cheated on me in this game.
In the analysis I learned that I was +0.8 after 20 moves and +1 after 33 moves.
However my much lower rated opponent was abel to play EXTREMELY precise and VERY fast at the same time in the endgame and I even had to fight very hard for a draw even though I was +1 going into an ending that was much better and much easier for for me to play.
Therfore it's beyond me why you think that this games indicates that I should have cheated.
There is nothing unusual or suspicious at all about my play in that game.
And you can't use average centipawn loss on it's own as proff of anything.
Instead you would have to go through the game move by move and see for your self if something in my play is suspicious.
But my play is simple and straight forward and I make a few mistakes also that the analysis doesn't notice.
The same can not be said about my opponents endgames skills though.
Therfor I will repeat.
There are nothing in the way I played the game that suggest cheating on my behalf, but the same can not be said about my opponent.
If you think otherwise I would like to hear from you what moves, or which sequence off moves played by me in the game that indicates cheating.
It's funny that you should use this example as I myself thought that my opponent cheated on me in this game.
In the analysis I learned that I was +0.8 after 20 moves and +1 after 33 moves.
However my much lower rated opponent was abel to play EXTREMELY precise and VERY fast at the same time in the endgame and I even had to fight very hard for a draw even though I was +1 going into an ending that was much better and much easier for for me to play.
Therfore it's beyond me why you think that this games indicates that I should have cheated.
There is nothing unusual or suspicious at all about my play in that game.
And you can't use average centipawn loss on it's own as proff of anything.
Instead you would have to go through the game move by move and see for your self if something in my play is suspicious.
But my play is simple and straight forward and I make a few mistakes also that the analysis doesn't notice.
The same can not be said about my opponents endgames skills though.
Therfor I will repeat.
There are nothing in the way I played the game that suggest cheating on my behalf, but the same can not be said about my opponent.
If you think otherwise I would like to hear from you what moves, or which sequence off moves played by me in the game that indicates cheating.
@KlausKristensen if you want to appeal your ban, you should send an e-mail to lichess.
If you want to report your opponent for cheating, you should use the report button.
There is no such thing as public appeal here.
This thread were better closed.
If you want to report your opponent for cheating, you should use the report button.
There is no such thing as public appeal here.
This thread were better closed.
Then, we are sorry, you had a bad day. Play blitz, and bullet, that's a tip
@cheateralert that is no solution, should not we be allowed to play classical. Also in blitz there regularly get cheaters caught. It would be a pity if on line chess were reduced to bullet because of cheating.
@KlausKristensen it is unfortunate that lichess has not yet had the opportunity to answer you. Some sort of appeal procedure should be in order. Also in the real world some innocent people get convicted of crimes they did not commit and some criminals walk free.
@KlausKristensen it is unfortunate that lichess has not yet had the opportunity to answer you. Some sort of appeal procedure should be in order. Also in the real world some innocent people get convicted of crimes they did not commit and some criminals walk free.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.