Why have I been marked as a "cheater" ?

After playing the game inserted below i'm refused to play rated games.
Which means that I have been marked as a cheater.
That is utter rubish though and the person responsible can't know much about chess.
My everage loss in centipawns is 10 and there is nothing odd in that.
The game was a simple exchange variation of the french and easy to play.
Besides that I made several inaccuracies that I discovered when I analysed the game afterwards.
A few of the are even clear mistakes.
And still i'm banned for playing rated games just because the average loss in centipawn in low.
That is rubbish and I would like an explanation from an admin as to why I have been marked as a cheater.
I will post the game below for everyone to see that there are no indication of cheating what so ever in the game.

[Event "Rated game"]
[Site "lichess.org/elaAfD1n"]
[Date "2017.06.09"]
[Round "-"]
[White "ferassaeedd"]
[Black "KlausKristensen"]
[Result "0-1"]
[WhiteElo "1816"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[PlyCount "48"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "900+15"]
[ECO "C01"]
[Opening "French Defense: Exchange Variation"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 { C01 French Defense: Exchange Variation } exd5 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. Bd3 Ne7 6. a3 Bxc3+ 7. bxc3 Bf5 8. Nf3 Bxd3 9. Qxd3 O-O 10. O-O h6 11. a4 Nbc6 12. Ba3 Re8 13. Rfe1 Nc8 14. Ne5 Nb6 15. Qf3?! { (0.00 → -0.89) Inaccuracy. Best move was Nxc6. } (15. Nxc6 bxc6) 15... Nxe5 16. dxe5 Nc4 17. Bc5?! { (-0.85 → -1.68) Inaccuracy. Best move was Qg3. } (17. Qg3 Qd7 18. Bc5 b6 19. Bd4 c5 20. Be3 Rxe5 21. Bxh6 Rxe1+ 22. Rxe1 f6 23. h3 Rf8) 17... Nxe5 18. Qg3 f6 19. Rad1 c6 20. Bd4 Nc4 21. Qg6?! { (-1.04 → -1.78) Inaccuracy. Best move was Rxe8+. } (21. Rxe8+ Qxe8 22. Bxf6 Qf7 23. Bd4 Re8 24. f3 b6 25. Re1 Rxe1+ 26. Qxe1 c5 27. Bf2 a5) 21... Re7 22. Rxe7 Qxe7 23. Kf1?! { (-1.95 → -2.80) Inaccuracy. Best move was f3. } (23. f3 b6 24. Kf2 Qe8 25. Qf5 Qf7 26. Re1 Re8 27. Be3 Qe7 28. Bd2 Qc5+ 29. Kg3 Rxe1) 23... Re8 24. Bxf6?? { (-2.56 → Mate in 2) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Best move was g3. } (24. g3 Kf8 25. Kg1 c5 26. Be3 Nxe3 27. Re1 Qd7 28. fxe3 Qxa4 29. Qf5 Qc6 30. Ra1 Re5) 24... Qe2+ { White resigns. } 0-1
Computeranalyse Træktider Korstabel FEN & PGN

Analysis showed that you have 0 blunders,0 mistakes and 0 inaccuracies.That means you played ''perfect game'',but if your opponent plays not very good and make much mistakes,then it's not hard to find best moves.

Agreed risky-chess.

And I far from played a perfect game so I do't know why it says 0 inaccuraies, 0 mistakes, 0 blunders.
Move 14...Nb6 is an drops 0,2 points
Move 17...Nxe5 drops 0,4 points
Move 18...f6 drops 0,4 points
Move 19...c6 drops 0,4 points
Move 20...Nc4 drops 0,2 points
All according to Stockfish 8.
IMO I made a least 3 inaccuracies in a simplified position.

Dear Mr Kristiansen,

I believe the protocol for expressing your distaste for the person responsible at Lichess who committed this 'utter rubbish' in banning you with absolutely no circumstantial evidence except for perhaps all of your games is to write a long, long letter (minimum 100 pages) explaining why you made each of your moves in every game that you have played and then print this letter and place it in the bin.

"absolutely no circumstantial evidence except for perhaps all of your games"

Have you seen all my games?
And yes I believe that i'm entitled to express my distaste for the banning procedure in here if it's based on statistics ALONE and not on the complexity of the game.

Not getting a blunder in 20 games is suspicious, isn't it? If you don't want to get banned that easy, play real rated games in real life. Your skills, your moves are as same as an IM, then reach IM before going into this site.

There is nothing suspicious about not getting a blunder in 20 games though? Any solid and good player can do the same. i saw through his game and the computer analysis and there are innacuracies which wouldn't have been here if he was using computer assistance.

@cheateralert

"Not getting a blunder in 20 games is suspicious"

What are you talking about???

No blunders in 20 games?

I have among other blunders been checkmated in 1 in a winning position.

The rest of what you write is so sillly that no comment in needed.

Okay, then, make another account.

@cheateralert

Perhaps if you or other "chess experts" would care to point out WHERE in the games the suspicious play occur before you accuse someone of cheating I would take you seriously.