Now I was expecting @ZwischenzugX11 to answer that geniuses could answer it after all. Funny(๐)
Now I was expecting @ZwischenzugX11 to answer that geniuses could answer it after all. Funny(๐)
Now I was expecting @ZwischenzugX11 to answer that geniuses could answer it after all. Funny(๐)
First you prove that god does exist.
As Carl Sagan wrote, "Extraordinarily claims require extraordinary evidence. "
He also wrote:
"A fire-breathing dragon lives in my garage"
Suppose (I'm following a group therapy approach by the psychologist Richard Franklin) I seriously make such an assertion to you. Surely you'd want to check it out, see for yourself. There have been innumerable stories of dragons over the centuries, but no real evidence. What an opportunity!
"Show me," you say. I lead you to my garage. You look inside and see a ladder, empty paint cans, an old tricycle--but no dragon.
"Where's the dragon?" you ask.
"Oh, she's right here," I reply, waving vaguely. "I neglected to mention that she's an invisible dragon."
You propose spreading flour on the floor of the garage to capture the dragon's footprints.
"Good idea," I say, "but this dragon floats in the air."
Then you'll use an infrared sensor to detect the invisible fire.
"Good idea, but the invisible fire is also heatless."
You'll spray-paint the dragon and make her visible.
"Good idea, but she's an incorporeal dragon and the paint won't stick."
And so on. I counter every physical test you propose with a special explanation of why it won't work.
Now, what's the difference between an invisible, incorporeal, floating dragon who spits heatless fire and no dragon at all? If there's no way to disprove my contention, no conceivable experiment that would count against it, what does it mean to say that my dragon exists? Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true. Claims that cannot be tested, assertions immune to disproof are veridically worthless, whatever value they may have in inspiring us or in exciting our sense of wonder. What I'm asking you to do comes down to believing, in the absence of evidence, on my say-so.
#1 Wait a minute, I've to ask my School's Debate Teacher...
Is the schroedinger's cat dead or alive?
delive
Technically thereโs as much proof that god exist as that toys talk when we are not looking, or that when you die, your souls turns into cheese. This is because, well, they all could be possible. If we fit all the scenarios, they would fit into current human knoledge.
Basicaly to sum up chummed thing untentionally but with a little more info ig?
#1
A couple of weeks back, you said that you have the answer to all things.
So why don't you just provide the arguements for both sides ? And tell me the conclusion later.
You are a 'genius' afterall.
Btw, I do believe in God's existence.
Also, even if I didn't, I really don't have time to argue with a self delusional and wannabe 'genius'.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.