- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

This Week So Far (America)

Meant to be informative, turned more into a half-rant.

*Evergreen school shooting*
- A student shot two schoolmates on Wednesday before turning the gun on himself. One of the wounded classmates was in critical condition.
- “He had to keep reloading. He would fire and reload, fire and reload, fire and reload. This went on and on, and as he did that, he tried to find new targets and he came up against a roadblock on many of those doors. He couldn't get to those kids, so there's not enough to be said for the work that the teachers, the coaches, the staff, the students,” Jefferson County Sheriff's Office public information officer Jacki Kelley said. “Lots of kids ran, but the ones who didn't were locked down and they were being cared for. So really, really proud of those people. I have to believe when you bring a gun to school and you continue to fire and reload and fire and reload that you are on a mission. We are grateful that he was less successful, but we're devastated that he was successful at all,” she said.
- Authorities say that Desmond Holly, the school shooter, was radicalized by extremist networks.

*Charlie Kirk*
- While giving a speech about gun rights, Charlie Kirk was shot dead. There is a certain irony in that.
- The suspect has both been said to have possible ties to Antifa and ties to Trump. Not sure which one it is -- these news sources all conflict with each other.
- I find all the celebration about his death online disturbing. It just rubs me the wrong way. I don't condone many of the man's political views, and the last time I saw a bit of his debate in Cambridge, he came off as arrogant, constantly cutting off his opponent and refusing to talk on the actual subject they were supposed to discuss (although it does seem like he had better debates). BUT regardless of how you feel about him, he was a person. His young children witnessed the death of their father (can you imagine healing from that trauma?) and now have to grow up knowing much of the world is making meme's about his death and saying he deserved it. Regardless of how one would feel about their father, that would not be a pleasant way to go through the rest of your childhood.
- Do you not see the problem in glorifying his death? He is already being made a MAGA martyr (which I find interesting considering his adamancy over the Epstein files). All these posts are just making more political unrest while justifying his current "martyr" status. Much of the liberal rhetoric is based off of being the person on the moral high ground, yet the moment that is put to the test, nobody is following up. Tolerance, kindness, forgiveness. Those are qualities often preached about on the left. I am no Republican but I would sure hope that people would actually bother to extend these -- while a dead man is not necessarily entitled to respect, it is not that difficult to respect his surviving family by avoiding celebrations, while not erasing what he said. You can still have huge problems with his political views while not using his death as a special occasion.
- Free speech is free speech. That includes opinions that can be considered hateful. Political violence is political violence no matter if you consider it justified or not. I don't care what you believe. Part of what makes America America is the ability to criticize. Heck, half of the people I know have made it their 24/7 job to be critics of America. And guess what? That's totally allowed by our First Amendment rights, for good reason! America is not meant to be an echo chamber and I sure hope it never will be. What sets us apart from other nations is the ability to recognize that all people have the right to their own personal worldview without going on witch hunts all the time.
- Another thing: free speech does not mean you have to personally agree with and/or respect everything. Nor does it mean that social media sites are not allowed to censor. BUT it does mean that the government cannot censor you unless you are making an incitement to violence, or creating things such as terrorist threats. And that's why I don't believe in the whole witch hunt and doxxing people over making comments on Kirk's death that's being sponsored by the Florida Department of Education. While celebration of his death makes me feel sick, I don't think that violating the first amendment helps any.

*9/11*
- I watched part of Trump's speech on 9/11 (not the rest though). Wasn't expecting much after how he talked about veterans in the past, but this was a pleasant surprise! He actually bothered to tell each hero's story, and ask them to stand for applause. He didn't try to gloss over everything; he actually gave the 24th anniversary of this terror attack meaningful importance. I do find his comments about America's revenge arc a little unnecessary; they don't contribute much to the speech.
- It amazes me. Far, far more people are arguing over Charlie Kirk and Trump's possible stroke than actually bothering to talk about 9/11. I was watching yesterday out of curiosity -- what if I didn't say anything? Would people still make a post on it? And I don't think I saw a single forum topic about 9/11 on here. Despite it claiming almost 3,000 lives, not a single person bothered to touch on it. Has our political polarization got to this point? Are we really going to miss the forest for the trees? What does #NeverForget even mean anymore? With all the time ya'll spend arguing over all these controversies, you would think that taking 2 minutes to talk about one of America's biggest tragedies wouldn't be such a big deal. What's going on? Have we really gotten ourselves this deep into the rabbit hole of politics?
- Let's talk about 9/11. Rescue dogs that went to help the scene would encounter so many dead bodies that they lost all morale. Police officers had to stage mock rescues for them just to keep them going. Flight 93. 44 people. 37 passengers, 2 pilots, 5 flight attendants, and 4 hijackers. The hijackers planned to crash the plane into a federal government in Washington D.C. Forty-six minutes into the flight, the hijackers murdered one passenger, stormed the cockpit, and struggled with the pilots as controllers on the ground listened in. Instead, the passengers fought back, forcing the terrorists to crash the plane in an open field. They knew that they would die, but they chose to do so by making a final stand and preventing further death. They chose to send the plane in a nosedive after learning of the suicide attacks. Today, we honor their sacrifice with the Tower of Voices -- a 93 foot tall structure that has 40 individual windchimes. => www.nps.gov/flni/planyourvisit/tower-of-voices.htm, representing each one of the passengers and crew members.
- This was one of the deadliest terror attacks in history. 2,977 people dead total. Of those, 19 hijackers committed murder-suicide, and the remaining were victims. Thousands more were injured. People still suffer from long-term health problems in the aftermath of the attack. 1,700 victims from the North Tower and 1,000 victims from the South Tower. 125 killed in the Pentagon. The remaining 265 fatalities? 92 passengers and crew of American Airlines Flight 11, the 65 aboard United Airlines Flight 175, the 64 aboard American Airlines Flight 77 and the 44 aboard United Airlines Flight 93. At least 102 countries lost their citizens in the attack.
- Don't let all of these people become a statistic a mere 24 years later. Their stories should be told. Not buried.
We protect possessions like money, valuable objects, government buildings with guards, metal detectors, and GUNS.
But not children... It's truly sad that people have so little common sense to think that someone wouldn't target a school, they just leave them wide open.

And thanks for the news update, I was aware that Charlie Kirk was killed.
But I didn't know trump might have had a stroke.
And is the school shooting you mentioned in Colorado?

And prayers for kirks family, and the victims in the school shooting,
And trump.

God help us all, with the way they run the schools it's amazing it doesn't happen more often.
Correct yourself. Charlie Kirk was not there specifically to defend gun rights. He was there to debate in a free an open arena the exchange of ideas. Free speech. But rather than take his invitation to pick up the mic and debate him to his face, a coward chose to assassinate him from 250 yards away, In front of his wife and children. Charlie Kirk was the last off ramp America had to avert a civil war with the first amendment and dialogue. But the left made it clear that the conversation is now not words but bullets. - The last thing the democrats care about is life. Free speech and democracy. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was the first shot in a much more bloody civil war that is inevitable at this stage.
Moderates and conservatives and many liberals will NOT and should NOT engage in civil. war.

If it is ever a time to cling to principle, this is the time.

Free speech is beloved by the strong and wise. They settle their differences with speech, not battles. They are not afraid to disagree politely and with clarity.

Those who cannot win debate --- who have no dependable arguments -- THEY might trend to violence or personal insult.

But that is weak. It is an unintentional but telling admission that their arguments and beliefs cannot be defended intellectually.

Look to see who can discuss an issue -- and learn to distinguish them from those who can only lash out.

Truth rises -- it can use the words of those who actually make the effort, in their own words, to defend it. It doesn't use or rely upon negative emojis, personal insults, or the cynical presentations of others. And it certainly does NOT depend upon violence.

I hope good-hearted persons who feel like we stand on the brink of civil war will simply step back -- and simply keep trying patiently to explain what seems obvious to many of us. Violence and insult are barbaric tools, at best. Violence and raw insult are empty and wrong.

Charlie Kirk valued both compassion and free speech, not violence and close-minded insult. And he was right to do so.

To borrow from the insightful observation of Greg Gutfeld, it is better to think than merely recite. I hope we see no more empty allegations of "fascism" and the like being applied reflexively and routinely in the face of good faith disagreement.
@ChessGospel Just chill out,

@greenteakitten might not have gotten all the facts perfect, but I commend her on her efferents.

Just cool it a little, I'm sure if you just tell her nicely she'll correct herself(if she's wrong)

She's cool, and I'd say very respectfully, and reasonable.
Certainly more than just about anyone on here.

I do get ware your coming from, but get ahold of your self. And don't make the climate of things even worse.
Thank you, @ThunderClap . in that video Bernie recognizes some important truth. And I hope his words are taken to heart by his fellow partisans. And by those who disagree with him, as well.

But I must add this: it is time for all to STOP calling adversaries "fascists" and "Nazis" and "racists" with nothing to justify it except political expediency.

Those are serious, evil labels. They MUST NOT be applied unthinkingly and reflexively -- but too often, they have been.

Before anyone smears a political adversary, they should actually get to know them. Truly.

Relatively few men are monsters. And we all must take care not to make monstrous allegations that are NOT REALLY justified. Because monstrous accusations can lead to monstrous behavior.

And that must stop, for the good of all. We should not assume that those who disagree with us are necessarily stupid or evil. Nearly all men act from good faith. And I hope, and suspect, that you will agree: name calling leads to nothing good.

Just as violence leads to nothing good.

I hope Bernie's message, in that regard, at least, spreads to others.
@ChessGospel said in #3:
> Correct yourself. Charlie Kirk was not there specifically to defend gun rights. He was there to debate in a free an open arena the exchange of ideas. Free speech. But rather than take his invitation to pick up the mic and debate him to his face, a coward chose to assassinate him from 250 yards away, In front of his wife and children. Charlie Kirk was the last off ramp America had to avert a civil war with the first amendment and dialogue. But the left made it clear that the conversation is now not words but bullets. - The last thing the democrats care about is life. Free speech and democracy. The assassination of Charlie Kirk was the first shot in a much more bloody civil war that is inevitable at this stage.

Actually, the statement about defending gun rights is not wrong. "A witness who saw the moment Charlie Kirk was fatally shot on Wednesday said the conservative activist had just begun debating someone about mass shootings and gun violence when the gunshot struck the 31-year-old in the neck." (CBS News) I never said that was the only thing he was debating. But it was what he was debating at that very moment.

There is no clear evidence either that the left or right shot him. Various sources go from claiming he was part of a pro-gun household (evident in his accurate aim) and a Trump supporter, to straight up the opposite of saying the shooter was into Antifa. I've seen both sides of the coverage and I'm not exactly sure if somebody's spreading misinformation or it's just too soon to tell (Please fact check me on this if I am wrong.)

Either way, I highly doubt a civil war is feasible. More likely, we'll just see social media's increasing polarization and a ton of riots on the streets.

And yes, I thought I mentioned already the trauma it would have been for his family? I believe Kirk's wife claimed that their three year old daughter ran to him after hearing the loud noise. Never once have I said it wasn't heartbreaking for them. In fact, I asked people to have some empathy.
@JesusIsSalvation

To my knowledge, there is little you can do to effectively stop school shootings once it starts besides grabbing another gun and shooting back.

The only real option to fight gun violence in schools is to go nuclear and regulate everything so much that it is absolutely suffocating, and even then that is not remotely foolproof. Or people could provide mental health support. But between the two the former seems to be the option most schools would pick.

I hate to use the saying in this context, but where there is a will, there is a way. Shooters *will* shoot, and the only way to prevent it is adequate mental health support that prevents people from becoming so mentally ill and radicalized that this is the life they choose.

About Trump's stroke - it is an unproven rumor. People noticed his mouth drooping at one end, a common sign of stroke. Combined with his previous bruises...well let's hope Vance is not the president anytime soon.

You most likely did not hear about the Colorado shooting because of the wall to wall Kirk coverage, by the way. It buried most older news stories on the subject.