the big bang theory. (please explain your point of view) • page 1/4 • Off-Topic Discussion • lichess.org

FilPatek

#1

I'm really interested about everyone's opinion about the Big Bang

tpr

#2

It is well established, and confirmed by WMAP.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkinson_Microwave_Anisotropy_Probe

It is well established, and confirmed by WMAP. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilkinson_Microwave_Anisotropy_Probe

water22 edited

#3

Beyond the fact that some sort of explosion happened, I'm not sure what there is to opine on

fin34601473braunpaul

#4

So called "sitcom" or physics theory?

Sitcom: Wants to show nerds but shows geeks, prequel gets chess wrong (wizard chess piece that cannot be taken and can switch places with another chessman is just a more or less royal piece and NOT an eternal prevention of checkmate).

Physics theory: Not sure about time running backwards, but according to the sitcom effect before cause would be a huge mess...

So called "sitcom" or physics theory? Sitcom: Wants to show nerds but shows geeks, prequel gets chess wrong (wizard chess piece that cannot be taken and can switch places with another chessman is just a more or less royal piece and NOT an eternal prevention of checkmate). Physics theory: Not sure about time running backwards, but according to the sitcom effect before cause would be a huge mess...

Wheneverxd

#5

So my view is: the Big Bang is a strong, evidence--based explanation, but it’s not the final chapter. It’s simply the best starting point we have right now.

And just to be clear, this is only my POV, nothing more.

For anyone who wants to explore the Big Bang Theory in detail, here’s a helpful source:
https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html

So my view is: the Big Bang is a strong, evidence--based explanation, but it’s not the final chapter. It’s simply the best starting point we have right now. And just to be clear, this is only my POV, nothing more. For anyone who wants to explore the Big Bang Theory in detail, here’s a helpful source: https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html

NeuralGnat

#6

I'm not sure about the big bang theory. In general, I don't like loud noises...

fallboss007

#7

BANG

**BANG**

OLLiEparker

#8

my opinion about the bangy bang bang is that it's litterally fake there is no way a loud noise could make things the only thing it does is break things like wine glasses and my ear drums

V1g1yy

#9

The "Big Bang" is an incomprehensibly simplified theory about how the universe may have begun. It might even be sorta what happened, but current day science is far too primitive to explain what actually happened.

Einstein theorized that black holes existed, but he was dead before the first one was found and confirmed. And even after it was found, it was quite a while till the science community even started to agree on the possibility that a BH was really what they were observing (or in this case, observED, since once they'd begun to agree, the star was already consumed and no longer observable).

Now that is a theory involving quantum physics and gravity, and oddly enough, even today after seeing black holes exist and showing what they do, nobody knows what makes gravity work. We know its effects, we can quantify what it will do, but have no idea how it works. And on top of that we can't replicate it. When you think of it that way, that we can't explain something we've known existed and observed for hundreds of years, it makes the big bang seem like a bit of a fools-errand to attempt to explain. I mean, all the collective knowledge on earth can't explain gravity, best of luck with the big bang.

For a pretty good explanation of what scientists think they know now, spend a few hours on this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LYSfpKog4w

The "Big Bang" is an incomprehensibly simplified theory about how the universe may have begun. It might even be sorta what happened, but current day science is far too primitive to explain what actually happened. Einstein theorized that black holes existed, but he was dead before the first one was found and confirmed. And even after it was found, it was quite a while till the science community even started to agree on the possibility that a BH was really what they were observing (or in this case, observED, since once they'd begun to agree, the star was already consumed and no longer observable). Now that is a theory involving quantum physics and gravity, and oddly enough, even today after seeing black holes exist and showing what they do, nobody knows what makes gravity work. We know its effects, we can quantify what it will do, but have no idea _how_ it works. And on top of that we can't replicate it. When you think of it that way, that we can't explain something we've known existed and observed for hundreds of years, it makes the big bang seem like a bit of a fools-errand to attempt to explain. I mean, all the collective knowledge on earth can't explain gravity, best of luck with the big bang. For a pretty good explanation of what scientists think they know now, spend a few hours on this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LYSfpKog4w

#10