@havfanridindis It doesn't take much effort to figure out all of that stuff is just paintings and artwork. Even NASA admits that, and we have no photos of a globe so I can only go off actual science. NASA is completely out of the picture, all of what they do is fake and I say this from unbiased research.
@Skittle-Head I am aware of the experiment, the problem with that is he is automatically assuming multiple variables... a distance sun being a major obvious one. But besides that, it would be unreasonable to take that one experiment and say that it is the end-all because I know way too many experiments that show that those calculated circumferences are plainly false. And it isn't even just the experiments, if you want be to start listing reasons i made like my own 300 reasons off top of my head on paper months asgo but i threw it away when looking for my debit card to return a ring loool. I mean here's the thing bro, the list is way too tall for me to say "sticks and shadows" and dismiss everything else, it is so far unsatisfactory when the evidence on other side is piled up that it is actually laughable. I don't care if it is flat or globe though is the thing, but the reason I say flat is the evidence is so much that even if someone who believes a globe gives me something to research, it ends up unsatisfactory and silly like that (because the pile of evidence on other side is just plain too much, if the earth was a globe we shouldn't be having this debate is the thing... there is a reason the evidences are stacked for flat and you even have to use such a small experiment, because all experiments to show a movement of earth show none, the abundence of experiments thart should be able to show curvature always fail, the real reason I think you believe a globe isn't even just because you were taught it, but most people it shakes their view of this world into a shock. But I have the same view whether flat or ball lol
@Skittle-Head I am aware of the experiment, the problem with that is he is automatically assuming multiple variables... a distance sun being a major obvious one. But besides that, it would be unreasonable to take that one experiment and say that it is the end-all because I know way too many experiments that show that those calculated circumferences are plainly false. And it isn't even just the experiments, if you want be to start listing reasons i made like my own 300 reasons off top of my head on paper months asgo but i threw it away when looking for my debit card to return a ring loool. I mean here's the thing bro, the list is way too tall for me to say "sticks and shadows" and dismiss everything else, it is so far unsatisfactory when the evidence on other side is piled up that it is actually laughable. I don't care if it is flat or globe though is the thing, but the reason I say flat is the evidence is so much that even if someone who believes a globe gives me something to research, it ends up unsatisfactory and silly like that (because the pile of evidence on other side is just plain too much, if the earth was a globe we shouldn't be having this debate is the thing... there is a reason the evidences are stacked for flat and you even have to use such a small experiment, because all experiments to show a movement of earth show none, the abundence of experiments thart should be able to show curvature always fail, the real reason I think you believe a globe isn't even just because you were taught it, but most people it shakes their view of this world into a shock. But I have the same view whether flat or ball lol