>@xochinla I don't believe you've offered one shred of a evidence that demonstrates
>anything more than the same generalization and partial ideas that you accuse me of.
Regardless of what you believe, I have indicated a great deal of evidence, that apparently is too inconvenient to address and so gets ignored.
>In fact, besides the endless videos you post (which does little more than demonstrate your own impotence and lack of necessary education to speak with any authority in these matters),
Again with the emphasis on my "impotence" and "lack of necessary education", (my person) without bothering to address the factuality or logic of anything I have stated. This is a form of ad-hominem. Yes I draw on others who ARE far more scholarly, educated, articulate, and who have put far more work into assembling the evidence for these arguments than I have or possibly that I am even capable of.
The argument that because I post videos and books and make a note of the many other people making the same claims that I am, is not evidence one way or the other of my personal understanding. The words I actually author are the only evidence of that, and if you can show *how* they are lacking in understanding, where they are wrong, then you can edify and enlighten me on the issue instead of merely deriding me with the logic defying claim that I because I post fact based documentaries to corroborate my position, that it necessarily means I have no understanding of said subjects.
>That is of couse if you are comfortable enough to address these matters without your video assistance.
What about books? The problem is you are not comfortable with actual documentation and facts. You fail to address them, claim my use of them is evidence of my ignorance, and now you want to ban them from the conversation. I think not. You can take your suggestion to limit the parameters of discussion on these topics, and well... I think you know the rest.
>anything more than the same generalization and partial ideas that you accuse me of.
Regardless of what you believe, I have indicated a great deal of evidence, that apparently is too inconvenient to address and so gets ignored.
>In fact, besides the endless videos you post (which does little more than demonstrate your own impotence and lack of necessary education to speak with any authority in these matters),
Again with the emphasis on my "impotence" and "lack of necessary education", (my person) without bothering to address the factuality or logic of anything I have stated. This is a form of ad-hominem. Yes I draw on others who ARE far more scholarly, educated, articulate, and who have put far more work into assembling the evidence for these arguments than I have or possibly that I am even capable of.
The argument that because I post videos and books and make a note of the many other people making the same claims that I am, is not evidence one way or the other of my personal understanding. The words I actually author are the only evidence of that, and if you can show *how* they are lacking in understanding, where they are wrong, then you can edify and enlighten me on the issue instead of merely deriding me with the logic defying claim that I because I post fact based documentaries to corroborate my position, that it necessarily means I have no understanding of said subjects.
>That is of couse if you are comfortable enough to address these matters without your video assistance.
What about books? The problem is you are not comfortable with actual documentation and facts. You fail to address them, claim my use of them is evidence of my ignorance, and now you want to ban them from the conversation. I think not. You can take your suggestion to limit the parameters of discussion on these topics, and well... I think you know the rest.
