Right.
I dunno, but it makes sense; when the pedulum swings once it's on the other side. When it swings twice, it's back where it began. From your grandfather to you, 2 swings.
Well, driving isn't just liberating; it's also a lot of fun.
That...feels like something hidden. Even though it wasn't what I had in mind, sure enough, two swings of the pendulum jumps the sine wave from identity to grandchild. The way weird war-like
environments zigzag across generations independent of how old or how young they are with modern life, you'd have to think it is quite like a jump from grandparent to grandchild.
Fun is something I am capable of managing with just my research. :D Without driving though I'm basically just gonna be stuck with some weirdo for the longest time no matter where I stay lol.
Never minded being the social outcast, just gets annoying being stuck in weird situations I can't get out of. I know I can do some work, too. I've been delving into lower-level programming than the
kind of stuff my dad's been doing lately.
Research is fun, but abstraction or hearsay is a poor substitute for experience.
work is good.
lol, my experience is not a matter of what I hear other people saying, as programming doesn't necessarily have to do with computers. It just takes the ability to derive information for yourself,
which is experience.
Shame I haven't been paid for it since I was 14 though. First and last time so far I've ever had a job.
Some information can only be derived reflexively, thru direct personal experience (eg. trial and error). It's like learning how to ride a bike; sure, you can deconstruct the physics of it, but
learning to ride (balance, momentum, etc.) is not an academic exercise.
I never learned how to ride a bike till I was 12 lol.
I don't really care that there are different types of experience. Wishing things to be less challenging is cowardly and pointless. I embrace the allowance of my suffering to dissolve any such fears
of it, except where it's efficient for much smaller things that lie ahead to simply skim past them.
It is not abstraction to reverse-engineer a programming model; it is a possible way to understand a part of the human mind as well. No systematic thought process of logical reasoning would only then
have nothing to model with programming within such human minds, but I don't picture cases where that may exist.
It's not a matter of less or more challenging; some things are simply impossible to learn by the book.
Learning is a matter of imputs; some imputs are physical, reflexive, unconscious, subconscious - ie. not intellectual (which is wholly self-conscious).
logic is superficial
Yet "the book" can refer to anything. My own book of findings, someone else's findings, or "hearsay"? I've already addressed that programming doesn't necessarily correlate with any of those, and
because it is bound by mathematical rules, I am interested in an instance of what is impossible to learn of it. True, it cannot represent everything on an actual scale of reality, but it's a flow
that is capable of analyzing any given system. Therefore everyone has it and uses it when analyzing.
Well sure. Why not superficial? I'm sure that logic is superficial. It's a model basically, a high-level model and a low-level one. A model of what...well it could be anything I guess. I'm not
sure what an "imput" is, as I guess that's not in the dictionary, but I did remember reading that "intelligence" is basically one's ability to learn. Not sure if intellect could have anything to do
with that.
You're "interested in an instance of what is impossible to learn of it."? how does that even make sense?
As for "bound by mathematical rules"; perhaps, but many of our systems' rules are subconscious/unconscious - like those of desire/love, our relationship to music, much of our physical activity
(learning to walk, etc.), our hereditary loyalties, etc. Learning these things therefore is possible only thru experiencing them personally; and understanding these systems self-consciously then is
only really possible by reflecting on our own experiences.
We may capture glimpses otherwise, but the shadow of something is not essentially representative.
Our capacity then in these spheres is not necessarily one's ability to process logic, but rather something else to do with our fundamental, biological programming (ie. what determines one's emotional
or social intelligence? or physical intelligence?).
An instance is just another way of saying an example, more-or-less. How does that not make sense?
Because logic, while recursive and founded on [albeit very fundamental] assumptions, is capable of modeling anything that we are capable of analyzing, it can be used to analyze anything. That's all I
was saying. It's not a very upsetting point I think xD
Though it is worth noting that Cancer and Scorpio are intuitive and emotional signs. Scorpio is the more stubborn of the two, but its polar opposite sign Taurus is logic-oriented and probably the
most stubborn sign out there lol.
oh yeah, and random thing I realized, but '81 is Year of the Rooster...if I'm correct controlaltdelete's sign in the Eastern zodiac is Rabbit, which is your polar opposite too XD
anyway how the fuck...
oh, right, a post, almost forgot...gotta reply XD
Man, those things are all only learn-able through experience, too, because love, music etc. is something we have to witness and physical activity the shit we gotta do. Thing is, the only way to learn
math is to do math (either in your head or on paper don't matter, I personally prefer in my head), so you have to experience it anyway. So it's a somewhat subjective point XD as it seems to cover
basically anything we learn that concerns experience.
So, of course then, it stands to reason that logic is just an example, one possible instance, of what maintains our capacity to experience or otherwise learn, something. In fact, I daresay that logic
and mathematics are basically the same exact thing. We confuse mathematics as a "language" where you write squiggles on a piece of paper called "numbers", but we humans are just limited to thinking
of a language to model a subset of logic called arithmetic, or algebra, or that retarded high-level Calculus bullshit that everyone gives a fuck about lol.