Reading the lichess.org/page/accuracy and curious, what is the real value of accuracy metrics if for blunderfest:
with 5 blunders I still have 89% accuracy?
How is that possible? I am trying to dig into the lichess.org/page/accuracy , but can't still understand what accuracy really reflects in case in 42 moves I had 5 blunders and still have 89% accuracy?
My "personal feeling" of accuracy here is not more than 60%.
Can it really makes any sense if blunderfest has "almost" 100% accuracy? If so, we have very narrow range of percentage between blunderfest and "good" games. Like, these first 89% almost doesn't work.
How do you fell about it?
with 5 blunders I still have 89% accuracy?
How is that possible? I am trying to dig into the lichess.org/page/accuracy , but can't still understand what accuracy really reflects in case in 42 moves I had 5 blunders and still have 89% accuracy?
My "personal feeling" of accuracy here is not more than 60%.
Can it really makes any sense if blunderfest has "almost" 100% accuracy? If so, we have very narrow range of percentage between blunderfest and "good" games. Like, these first 89% almost doesn't work.
How do you fell about it?