Quoting - only once

@heallan said in #39:
> You may or may not be critisimg me in the same way that you may or may not be interrogating me.
Let us end the conversation here.

As I mentioned in #8, I had got the answer to my question.
However, I must comment some posts.
@heallan said in #30:
> If the user is being quoted numerous times for the same post content, this is a form of interrogation.
If we quote a post and next, by mistake, we delete it, then what is wrong in quoting the post again?
@lucky_Nan
I am a man and Marcin is my real name. I see that I have become the subject of this thread!

@Marcin2 said in #42:
> As I mentioned in #8, I had got the answer to my question.
> However, I must comment some posts.
>
> If we quote a post and next, by mistake, we delete it, then what is wrong in quoting the post again?
> @lucky_Nan
> I am a man and Marcin is my real name. I see that I have become the subject of this thread!
Oh, well nice to know that you are a he!

@heallan said in #40:
> It fleshes out the salient fact that the English language uses gender specific pronouns to denote non-gender specific articles.

This used to be universally true. Now society has changed, and gender pronouns are politicized. Following the old convention indicates your conservative stance on a number of issues.

@mcgoves said in #44:
> This used to be universally true. Now society has changed, and gender pronouns are politicized. Following the old convention indicates your conservative stance on a number of issues.

To say that usage of an article in general is indicative of the persuasion of an individual's specific alignment is like saying that the offspring of two related equines producing infertile offspring can only be described in a nebulous sense, rather than referring to it in a practical way: "that's a mule, he looks docile".

@lucky_Nan said in #41:
> Let us end the conversation here.
Yeah, I'm tired of that back and forth fighting.

@raygeng said in #46:
> Yeah, I'm tired of that back and forth fighting.
Oh.