You are acting weird and i tought you are a nice person for wanting to teach others atomic and not for money. Hahaha how a disappointment.
@Wjx2MyQvLW99sHmeCGQQ
I am a nice person, but that doesn't mean I have to deal with you :P
Don't think I don't want Lichess's good, but, frankly, your ideas are just crazy. Doesn't the fact that after years and years of of Lichess developers working at it they came up with a system totally different than what you have in mind tell you something?
Surely you don't want to say you know better than all those in the Lichess team!
I am a nice person, but that doesn't mean I have to deal with you :P
Don't think I don't want Lichess's good, but, frankly, your ideas are just crazy. Doesn't the fact that after years and years of of Lichess developers working at it they came up with a system totally different than what you have in mind tell you something?
Surely you don't want to say you know better than all those in the Lichess team!
I didn't say that and actually you don't know what i've said especially if you didnt read what i wrote. I offered a feature idea for the community witch was an amazing mistake. And expressed my opinion about the public shaming topic. Now what i have in mind, should I make a topic "Wjx2MyQvLW99sHmeCGQQ's fresh timekiller games" i seen Sagron's fresh blitz games. I would post my time outted games here and if dare anyone to complain, i will report them for saying I'm a time-outter and for publicly shaming. How's that?
@Wjx2MyQvLW99sHmeCGQQ
No, you didn't say it especially, but you said I'm childish when I said I support the current system, which was made by Lichess developers. Number one.
Number two. Sure, do whatever you want. When I first saw you I thought you were a nice person as well, but now I don't want to deal with you anymore. I don't care, go make the moderators ban you if you want, all I'm thankful for is your crazy ideas will never be put into practice!
No, you didn't say it especially, but you said I'm childish when I said I support the current system, which was made by Lichess developers. Number one.
Number two. Sure, do whatever you want. When I first saw you I thought you were a nice person as well, but now I don't want to deal with you anymore. I don't care, go make the moderators ban you if you want, all I'm thankful for is your crazy ideas will never be put into practice!
@AcademicNinja99 Wow dude this guy is super weird. I liked how you kept your kindness and not insulted him.
@savagechess2k
Thanks XD
Good thing I was here before you ;)
Though I guess saying his ideas were crazy might be viewed as a bit of an insult :/
Thanks XD
Good thing I was here before you ;)
Though I guess saying his ideas were crazy might be viewed as a bit of an insult :/
Thank you, pawn-ij. That made my day.
I will Abort this forum!
@Wjx2MyQvLW99sHmeCGQQ
I'm going to attempt to respond to some of the things you wrote in post #17. My responses are intended only to explain my reasoning.
"Others can abort the game but if i tell the fact they do it then i get a penalty?"
They are penalized as well, just not publicly. Lichess recently added a warning message to warn against this. It displays in chat after a player aborts a game.
"then dont do it but i wont delete nothing because i said a fact sb aborts."
This is indeed a violation of lichess policy. You are free to make a post suggesting that it be changed, but you may not violate it simply because you disagree.
"Red color as public shaming? There are some MODs in MMORPG's where the mod colors the names based on how good they play then thats shaming too?"
Displaying quality of play is different than displaying quality of character.
"Showing how many games he aborted is shaming, then its a shaming telling about them how much elo they have like i say penguin has a elo of 2700 its a shaming."
See above.
"Someone made a post about sb who didnt give her a takeback and pinned his name on a forum post i guess thats still out there."
Perhaps it should have been removed. It is difficult to identify and remove every instance of public shaming.
"Also i got a IP ban from forum and private messages and in game chat permanent ban for saying that someone is a ELO padder."
This is also a violation of lichess policy; you are criticizing another player's character in public. (I'm assuming this isn't in a private message)
"Also aborting games and let times run out is right?"
It isn't right, which is why lichess takes action against it.
"Isnt it aganist a policy to abort a game and destroy minutes of gameplay by leaving the game?"
It is, and lichess takes action against it.
"Now i shame someone (actually saying how many games he aborts like i say his ELO) 20 times i agree to get a ban for 1 day like they do."
Again, it is a violation of policy. Display of play quality and display of character quality are treated separately.
"But in fact this REALLY encourages me to make my opponent wait for 12 minutes because I leave the game..."
Please don't.
"...and then whine when they complain about me, this would at least may change this ridicolous policy but i guess you don't understand the meaning of shaming."
It would still be shaming if someone did it to you.
"Telling a fact about someone is shaming, how? Please explain."
It is shaming when the intent of sharing the fact is to tarnish the reputation of the other person.
"Really i will make a website and make a public list there not linked to my account so they all see the list of aborters and time quitters."
Operating outside of lichess is perfectly fine since lichess policy can't apply to another website. But don't be surprised if sharing the link to said website on lichess is considered to be publicly naming and shaming.
I'm going to attempt to respond to some of the things you wrote in post #17. My responses are intended only to explain my reasoning.
"Others can abort the game but if i tell the fact they do it then i get a penalty?"
They are penalized as well, just not publicly. Lichess recently added a warning message to warn against this. It displays in chat after a player aborts a game.
"then dont do it but i wont delete nothing because i said a fact sb aborts."
This is indeed a violation of lichess policy. You are free to make a post suggesting that it be changed, but you may not violate it simply because you disagree.
"Red color as public shaming? There are some MODs in MMORPG's where the mod colors the names based on how good they play then thats shaming too?"
Displaying quality of play is different than displaying quality of character.
"Showing how many games he aborted is shaming, then its a shaming telling about them how much elo they have like i say penguin has a elo of 2700 its a shaming."
See above.
"Someone made a post about sb who didnt give her a takeback and pinned his name on a forum post i guess thats still out there."
Perhaps it should have been removed. It is difficult to identify and remove every instance of public shaming.
"Also i got a IP ban from forum and private messages and in game chat permanent ban for saying that someone is a ELO padder."
This is also a violation of lichess policy; you are criticizing another player's character in public. (I'm assuming this isn't in a private message)
"Also aborting games and let times run out is right?"
It isn't right, which is why lichess takes action against it.
"Isnt it aganist a policy to abort a game and destroy minutes of gameplay by leaving the game?"
It is, and lichess takes action against it.
"Now i shame someone (actually saying how many games he aborts like i say his ELO) 20 times i agree to get a ban for 1 day like they do."
Again, it is a violation of policy. Display of play quality and display of character quality are treated separately.
"But in fact this REALLY encourages me to make my opponent wait for 12 minutes because I leave the game..."
Please don't.
"...and then whine when they complain about me, this would at least may change this ridicolous policy but i guess you don't understand the meaning of shaming."
It would still be shaming if someone did it to you.
"Telling a fact about someone is shaming, how? Please explain."
It is shaming when the intent of sharing the fact is to tarnish the reputation of the other person.
"Really i will make a website and make a public list there not linked to my account so they all see the list of aborters and time quitters."
Operating outside of lichess is perfectly fine since lichess policy can't apply to another website. But don't be surprised if sharing the link to said website on lichess is considered to be publicly naming and shaming.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.