i) Lichess can automate the procedure
It already does. It marks up people as cheaters in the majority of cases.
ii) compare average inaccuracies, mistakes, blunders with recent games
An inaccurate way of doing it. For example, this game: http://en.lichess.org/pp7fqeeW I have 0 0 0 with 9 centipawn loss, but we can all agree that no cheating was involved there. However, because I predominantly play bullet, that game is probably by far an outlier.
A better way would be to detect consistent patterns of low centipawn average, or 000, which is already done.
iii) Analyse time per move
Already done.
iv) Analyse if errors begin after a certain point
Not an efficient method of detecting cheaters - the player may just have memorised the first 5, 10, 15 moves in a particular line.
v) analyse errors before a particular time
Not an efficient method of detecting cheaters; maybe he's awful at openings, but great at tactics or endgames.
---
Just keep reporting cheating accounts. Moderators can see a lot more about a player than you can. I'd agree that consistent games of 000 (or 100) and low centipawn loss is suspicious, so PM me the account names you suspect, and I'll check it out - THIS IS ONLY FOR THIS THREAD, NOT IN GENERAL.
It already does. It marks up people as cheaters in the majority of cases.
ii) compare average inaccuracies, mistakes, blunders with recent games
An inaccurate way of doing it. For example, this game: http://en.lichess.org/pp7fqeeW I have 0 0 0 with 9 centipawn loss, but we can all agree that no cheating was involved there. However, because I predominantly play bullet, that game is probably by far an outlier.
A better way would be to detect consistent patterns of low centipawn average, or 000, which is already done.
iii) Analyse time per move
Already done.
iv) Analyse if errors begin after a certain point
Not an efficient method of detecting cheaters - the player may just have memorised the first 5, 10, 15 moves in a particular line.
v) analyse errors before a particular time
Not an efficient method of detecting cheaters; maybe he's awful at openings, but great at tactics or endgames.
---
Just keep reporting cheating accounts. Moderators can see a lot more about a player than you can. I'd agree that consistent games of 000 (or 100) and low centipawn loss is suspicious, so PM me the account names you suspect, and I'll check it out - THIS IS ONLY FOR THIS THREAD, NOT IN GENERAL.