Feature Request: Ignore players with digits in the names

@Akbar2thegreat said in #60:
> so I just asked for another game(s) to show and analyse else your statement would be devalued.

@Akbar2thegreat said in #60:
> I don't need to provide counter example.

Don't you find these two sentences "weird" in the same message? This is a kind of a bias which I can't name right now, but which should sound like "I shouldn't prove anything, it is obvious and you should prove everything, otherwise it is devalued". I would call it God-Bias. :)

Anyway, this doesn't sound like "the beauty of debate and communication". I expected equal expectations both to self and others.

@Motroskin
It happens that after I said something the next day I tend to say that I didn't said that meaning that I had probably said it when I was sleepy.
Common issue and my friends have tolerated me for this!
Currently it's late night or early morning here (4 AM) and I am already feeling tired. Will catch you up tomorrow.
(PS. I may even forget whole discussion but since I am now used to Lichess I will be back)

I see you play lot's of bullet games .......how are people cheating in BULLET!!! If you hate someone who has a number on their name don't start hating on every number people

@ArchivedChats said in #63:
> If you hate someone who has a number on their name don't start hating on every number people

This is not about hate, this is about wasting time. I just don't want to waste my time playing against computer, this is senseless.

@Motroskin said in #64:
> This is not about hate, this is about wasting time. I just don't want to waste my time playing against computer, this is senseless.

Question 1:How long do they take to move .....that alone can determine if they're cheating or not if their move patterns are very consecutive then maybe they're cheating but if not you just issues man

@ArchivedChats said in #65:
> Question 1:How long do they take to move .....that alone can determine if they're cheating or not if their move patterns are very consecutive then maybe they're cheating but if not you just issues man

This goes only to "beginner cheaters". Experienced cheaters have very fast engines which show even entire lines of attack and they imitate both time differentiation for "difficult moves" and "human mistakes and behavior". Tons on videos on YouTube. So, unfortunately, this is not the criterion anymore.

@Motroskin said in #64:
> This is not about hate, this is about wasting time

For example, like in this game: lichess.org/lXsEF12r/

Nothing to learn expect my trivial blunder 15. Nxe4. Just time wasted against chess engine.

@Motroskin said in #67:
> For example, like in this game: lichess.org/lXsEF12r/
>
> Nothing to learn expect my trivial blunder 15. Nxe4. Just time wasted against chess engine.

At move 15 you have 2:03 on your clock in a 2-minute game. In the next 15 moves you continue failing to play, let alone consider, moves which might make your opponent stop and think a bit... on moves 21-23 instead of b3/c4 or Rfb1 or Nh4/Nf5 or any sort of constructive plan, you quickly exchange away your only advantage in the position (a queenside pawn majority) and fail to play Re1 seizing the open e-file. Maybe you'd have better results if you played slightly slower, and played with a plan.

@Toadofsky said in #68:
> . Maybe you'd have better results if you played slightly slower, and played with a plan.

Well, thank you for the analysis, but for moves 21-23 my line gives about -7.2 score on average in many moves ahead, let's look at your options:
1. b3/c4 gives -8.9
2. Rfb1 gives the same -7.4
4. Nh4/Nf5 gives -8.5

So, none of them are better, some even worse. Note, you had time and my key point is that we didn't. So, my concern about this game is that in 2+1 time I do mistakes and my opponent doesn't. Just in comparison, yesterday I had a game where we did 12-13 blunders from both sides (lichess.org/PSJFtNWx/); it was a real blunderfest and although I felt hard, I felt a human behind the screen. And this is normal, there many games with 7-8 blunders from every side (lichess.org/UW0BnG57/, lichess.org/i8QZ7xxz/), although we usually have 2-3 blunders and it feels real.

But when 1700 player plays such a game in no time with just two inaccuracies, this is not real. Otherwise, why me and others do mistakes.

BTW, since you recommended to play with a plan what would be yours since move 21 taking into account my answers above?
For sure, after my blunder at move 15. Nxe4 the game is lost, but you mentioned that one must have a plan, anyway.

BTW/2. My blunder at move 15 was particularly caused by realizing by that moment that I again play against "numbered" cheater, since by this move all moves were like computer-style. Well, this is just an opening and he could lean it by heart, but, anyway, I feel this somehow when I fight a brick wall without any chance for success. So, move 15 was already a kind of "desperation give up".

That's mean, @Motroskin! There were a lot of total noobs on lichess when I came on board! :D