Why do extremely weak or unrated players take the game overly seriously?

@Ihavenothing Bro, I'm horrible at chess. But unlike these types of people, I know that I am. They have illusions of grandeur.

@PoolOfLiver I've no idea how those self-fabricated comments proves anything. I've one more question for you: Who would you take more seriously: Magnus Carlsen (rated 2875) who thought re2 was the best move in a certain position, or an average player who used a 3300-rated engine and claims that re3 is the best move?

@Dutch_Player 90+% of the I would trust a good engine over Magnus, yes. That wasn't the point though. The point of the "self-fabricated" post was to illustrate the kind of tone and style that these people write in, which I find hilarious.

@PoolOfLiver sorry thought you said you are great but won't brag. I like it, you could be another socrates. @dutchplayer there is no correct answer its catch 22

You sir are a prime example of a barely 2200 rated player projecting their own weaknesses. as a 2320+ elo player i can only laugh at your uninspired and unsophisticated attempt at pseudo-scientific psychoanalytical analysis

This thread was amusing to read. ( Reminds me of the comic masterpiece written by John Kennedy O'toole: A Confederacy of Dunces....)

@Triangel There is a line that we don't cross here, buddy.......

.....And comparing me with Eleuthero... I S T H A T L I N E.

On a serious note, though. This is an opinion-piece by me. I'm not trying to prove anything objective. I don't hold it against anyone if they disagree with me. Although apparently some people do hold disagreement with me personally against me, but I don't give two spits.