- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Should Chess Be Used And Learnt In Schools?

Beneficial or not, chess is just a game that requires extensive time and training, therefore general teaching will only get most students to just the basic level, and forcing people to play a game they do not enjoy will cause a diversion and a blockage in what they actually want to learn, because if someone is interested in chess they can learn at their own pace at their own time.

Also, there are a very small few who are qualified for proper teaching at the school setting while also being advanced enough to teach chess easily.

Beneficial or not, chess is just a game that requires extensive time and training, therefore general teaching will only get most students to just the basic level, and forcing people to play a game they do not enjoy will cause a diversion and a blockage in what they actually want to learn, because if someone is interested in chess they can learn at their own pace at their own time. Also, there are a very small few who are qualified for proper teaching at the school setting while also being advanced enough to teach chess easily.

Math will also get the pupils to a basic level and still we teach it while 8/10 hate it.

If you create a new subject it’s always a mess, which is why those things go gradually. Studies on few schools, then a county, …, some federal states and eventually the whole country. Entry requirements will be extremely low at first, not every class can get a GM obviously.

I think the only important part is whether or not it will be beneficial for the students. The implementation will be easy, there is so much stuff out there. A lazy teacher could just put on an educational stream from naroditzky or ashley and get a coffee once the students hit a certain level. Or let them play OTB and get a coffee. Mostly coffee 😄

Math will also get the pupils to a basic level and still we teach it while 8/10 hate it. If you create a new subject it’s always a mess, which is why those things go gradually. Studies on few schools, then a county, …, some federal states and eventually the whole country. Entry requirements will be extremely low at first, not every class can get a GM obviously. I think the only important part is whether or not it will be beneficial for the students. The implementation will be easy, there is so much stuff out there. A lazy teacher could just put on an educational stream from naroditzky or ashley and get a coffee once the students hit a certain level. Or let them play OTB and get a coffee. Mostly coffee 😄

as long as the school system of most countries is as it is, no

as long as the school system of most countries is as it is, no

You mean it’s hard to grade chess? Then don’t.

You mean it’s hard to grade chess? Then don’t.

@Rookitiki
"Math will also get the pupils to a basic level and still we teach it while 8/10 hate it."
Math is also what has helped in a lot of technological advancement, combined with engineering and computer science.
But I might be kinda biased since I'm a math nerd 😄

@Rookitiki "Math will also get the pupils to a basic level and still we teach it while 8/10 hate it." Math is also what has helped in a lot of technological advancement, combined with engineering and computer science. But I might be kinda biased since I'm a math nerd 😄

im not trying to talk down on math, its just a part of life. my point was even tho u have it for all those years u still know absolutely nothing and the little you get taught doesnt get appreciated except by a select few. when u go to university you will repeat 12-13y of math education and then some in two weeks and thats if you just run it as a side course. if you main it you will pick up even more speed.

other classes like history could easily be replaced with chess. all i learned in multiple years of history was that russia wants an ice-free harbour and is eyeing at the krim peninsula for that matter. now whether or not i wouldve learned that detail became irrelevant. also learning from history isnt a thing. greed dictates we do the same stuff over and over. maybe if it feels less like a deja-vu you can actually still get upset.

also studying your native language till the bitter end seems wrong to me. would be preferable to pick up a 3rd foreign language or a fourth - or chess or an instrument. i have learnt absolutely nothing in German class for the last 5 or 6 years that i was forced to take it.

im not trying to talk down on math, its just a part of life. my point was even tho u have it for all those years u still know absolutely nothing and the little you get taught doesnt get appreciated except by a select few. when u go to university you will repeat 12-13y of math education and then some in two weeks and thats if you just run it as a side course. if you main it you will pick up even more speed. other classes like history could easily be replaced with chess. all i learned in multiple years of history was that russia wants an ice-free harbour and is eyeing at the krim peninsula for that matter. now whether or not i wouldve learned that detail became irrelevant. also learning from history isnt a thing. greed dictates we do the same stuff over and over. maybe if it feels less like a deja-vu you can actually still get upset. also studying your native language till the bitter end seems wrong to me. would be preferable to pick up a 3rd foreign language or a fourth - or chess or an instrument. i have learnt absolutely nothing in German class for the last 5 or 6 years that i was forced to take it.

I think they should encourage you to play chess but shouldn't enforce it.

I think they should encourage you to play chess but shouldn't enforce it.

It should not be enforced, but it should be encouraged. Because It improves patience, problem-solving, creativity, calculation-skills, and is also fun.

It should not be enforced, but it should be encouraged. Because It improves patience, problem-solving, creativity, calculation-skills, and is also fun.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.