Obviously, It's very well known no human on earth can have a chance against modern Engines even when it's implemented on a very poor hardware. But why? and I mean a "deep Why".
Undoubtedly, Engines are beasts in calculations but on the other hand they don't understand chess like humans do; they only understand numbers and in many occasions we saw them completely overlook a position (according to their numbers) just like the puzzles that engines failed to solve until now or like when Stockfish was completely crushed by [AI] Alphazero (who taught itself chess in 6 hours).
Back then when I reviewed the games between (Stockfish 8) and (Alphazero) that took place in 2018, it was clear to me that chess isn't only about calculation and it's more about "Understanding".. As I believe, the more you understand chess strategically the better your chances are against the top engines. And there is no doubt how brilliant humans can be when it comes to chess understanding so WHY humans are so psychologically defeated against the computers!! is it all about the psychological advantage that engines wouldn't miscalculate?.
Objectively speaking, What would happen if brilliant minds like (Fisher, Morphy, Alekhine ..etc) played against the modern Engines and somehow without the information they are playing computers.. What would the results turn to be then? can't humans get a single win??? I honestly believe humans will get many wins once they break the psychological barrier.
Eventually, I'd love to mention "George Dantzig" homework story. When he was a college student he arrived late to his course and assumed the problems on the board were a homework assignment. According to Dantzig, they "seemed to be a little harder than usual", but a few days later he handed in completed solutions for both problems, still believing that they were an assignment that was overdue but later he found out that his professor was giving them "The Unsolvable Math Problem" to demonstrate how some problems are IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SOLVED.
Thank you, can't wait to hear your opinions!
Undoubtedly, Engines are beasts in calculations but on the other hand they don't understand chess like humans do; they only understand numbers and in many occasions we saw them completely overlook a position (according to their numbers) just like the puzzles that engines failed to solve until now or like when Stockfish was completely crushed by [AI] Alphazero (who taught itself chess in 6 hours).
Back then when I reviewed the games between (Stockfish 8) and (Alphazero) that took place in 2018, it was clear to me that chess isn't only about calculation and it's more about "Understanding".. As I believe, the more you understand chess strategically the better your chances are against the top engines. And there is no doubt how brilliant humans can be when it comes to chess understanding so WHY humans are so psychologically defeated against the computers!! is it all about the psychological advantage that engines wouldn't miscalculate?.
Objectively speaking, What would happen if brilliant minds like (Fisher, Morphy, Alekhine ..etc) played against the modern Engines and somehow without the information they are playing computers.. What would the results turn to be then? can't humans get a single win??? I honestly believe humans will get many wins once they break the psychological barrier.
Eventually, I'd love to mention "George Dantzig" homework story. When he was a college student he arrived late to his course and assumed the problems on the board were a homework assignment. According to Dantzig, they "seemed to be a little harder than usual", but a few days later he handed in completed solutions for both problems, still believing that they were an assignment that was overdue but later he found out that his professor was giving them "The Unsolvable Math Problem" to demonstrate how some problems are IMPOSSIBLE TO BE SOLVED.
Thank you, can't wait to hear your opinions!
