Piece values really don't seem to be accurate unless I'm really missing the point which wouldn't be the first time....not even today.
If the B is 3 points then why in the world would the queen be worth 9? It's pretty obvious that 3 in bishops are better than one queen isnt it.
Why not just say "pawn is worth least, then the horsey, then the bishops are maybe a little more then the knight and the queen is with most", because the values of the pieces need amending.
Why 9 and not seven? So a queen for two bishops and a pawn (and that is pushing it).
This ain't trolling I really don't see the logic in the values.
Oh, I then you have bad good placement which would without doubt affect effect the value of the pieces. Like bad bishop Vs good bishop.
If the B is 3 points then why in the world would the queen be worth 9? It's pretty obvious that 3 in bishops are better than one queen isnt it.
Why not just say "pawn is worth least, then the horsey, then the bishops are maybe a little more then the knight and the queen is with most", because the values of the pieces need amending.
Why 9 and not seven? So a queen for two bishops and a pawn (and that is pushing it).
This ain't trolling I really don't see the logic in the values.
Oh, I then you have bad good placement which would without doubt affect effect the value of the pieces. Like bad bishop Vs good bishop.