This initiative doesn't make sense in my opinion. The best game of a player rated 1500 is the worst of someone rated 2500. It all depends on rating. It should be made on ranges. Best 1500-1600 game, best 1600-1700 game and so on. A 1500 player game can't be better than a 2500 player one.
Also, there're soooo many games... too many! How many will send their game?
@Basch_of_Dalmasca said in #56:
> This initiative doesn't make sense in my opinion. The best game of a player rated 1500 is the worst of someone rated 2500. It all depends on rating. It should be made on ranges. Best 1500-1600 game, best 1600-1700 game and so on. A 1500 player game can't be better than a 2500 player one.
They didn't define what is the best game. Personally I was tempted to send a game with 17 blunders. Who knows.
> This initiative doesn't make sense in my opinion. The best game of a player rated 1500 is the worst of someone rated 2500. It all depends on rating. It should be made on ranges. Best 1500-1600 game, best 1600-1700 game and so on. A 1500 player game can't be better than a 2500 player one.
They didn't define what is the best game. Personally I was tempted to send a game with 17 blunders. Who knows.
lichess.org/study/BYzRuIWd/Ulzubj01
A typical french but putting a queen on a1!?
I sacrificed The rook at the end for a really good attack.
A typical french but putting a queen on a1!?
I sacrificed The rook at the end for a really good attack.
I sacrificed THE ROOOOK!
Nice game Harshin.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.