good or bad ?
@blunder_and_lose said in #1:
> good or bad ?
It's pretty good, better than 70% of people, but if you can, concentrate on rapid and classical,those really will improve your chess
> good or bad ?
It's pretty good, better than 70% of people, but if you can, concentrate on rapid and classical,those really will improve your chess
Classical and Rapid are BETTER than blitz ‘cause if you get to 1 min and there’s a intense position you have to think but with 1 min you can’t now in classical 25 mins with 2 secs increment is good because if you get into the same trouble intensity position you will be like in blitz you will be like ️ and in ultra bullet and bullet don’t get me there now I have played these but I knew that winning by time is sad even to me if I win out of checkmate I will be happy but don’t play 180+180 now if you WANT TO for FUN you can play blitz but at least put SOME SORT OF increment! This is just what I think you can listen or not! Best of luck in all your games and in 3+0 don’t play in 3+2 go ahead . Please read all of this I am saying this to help and never quit
@aaravbm
im play for fun classic bore
im play for fun classic bore
Okay @blunder_and_lose
Sounds good to me, how long have you been playing?
pretty good
@JustCopperfish
2-3 year
2-3 year
i see
Wouldn't you grow more in technique if you play 3+2? You don't have the luxury to flag the opponent, you need to checkmate him. Maybe I am wrong but this is my thought now.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.