Free online Chess server. Play Chess now in a clean interface. No registration, no ads, no plugin required. Play Chess with the computer, friends or random opponents.
Sign in
Reconnecting
  1. Forum
  2. General Chess Discussion
  3. Highest amount of inaccuracies in your game

I stumbled through this game I played 4 months ago and I was surprised i got 40 inaccuracies.
lichess.org/l889WYpT
So I decided to ask you guys the amount of inaccuracies you had in your game.

jajajaja, like stars in the sky my friend, jajaja.

Better to have 42 inaccuracies than 2 blunders

What would be more interesting is a game where the winner (by checkmate, not time-out) has a higher number of inaccuracies, mistakes and/or blunders than the loser (at least in aggregate; I don't think all three measures would add-up to checkmate, unless a by-chance blunder or mouse-slip, etc).

In all my experience, it boils down to one player or the other having a greater degree of at least two (2) of those measures (loser), than the opponent (winner). Even if the loser has lesser in 2 out of 3 categories, and/or equal in the 3rd category would be an interesting find. (If a query could be run on such games.)

I'm not sure what my highest number of inaccuracies is, but, I'm pretty sure it's pretty high. (I'm not a very good player.)

@MrCharles
I'm not sure if its actually possible for a victor by checkmate to have a higher ACPL.

... and that's what makes it interesting (if such a condition exists). Much more interesting than the OP's query.

lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/what-is-the-centi-pawn-loss-cap-lets-see

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.