What would be more interesting is a game where the winner (by checkmate, not time-out) has a higher number of inaccuracies, mistakes and/or blunders than the loser (at least in aggregate; I don't think all three measures would add-up to checkmate, unless a by-chance blunder or mouse-slip, etc).
In all my experience, it boils down to one player or the other having a greater degree of at least two (2) of those measures (loser), than the opponent (winner). Even if the loser has lesser in 2 out of 3 categories, and/or equal in the 3rd category would be an interesting find. (If a query could be run on such games.)
I'm not sure what my highest number of inaccuracies is, but, I'm pretty sure it's pretty high. (I'm not a very good player.)