Grob's Attack is not successful

I'm starting to learn some opening lines. I saw this thread about the best openings: lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/best-chess-openings

The Grob's Attack got upvoted early on in the thread. So I watched some tutorials on the attack. I tried it out yesterday and today. I played about 30 anonymous games (15mins+3sec). I can say that the attack was only successful about 2/30 games. The remaining games, the attack had to be aborted due to opponents skills were great enough to make the attack unsuccessful.
I imagine it would work against beginner player, or maybe bullet games.
In conclusion, I'm abandoning the attack and focusing on some other opening line.

So should attack be only attempted if you know your opponent is roughly a beginner? Playing anonymous , I don't know the actual rating of the players, but it did not go very well.

I think they were having a bit of fun. It's a very unconventional and really only has the benefit of surprise as weaker players will not know how to respond. As you can see, it was downvoted quite a bit. That isn't to say it can't be effective against stronger players. It was once used in an online match against Magnus Carlsen resulting in a draw. Regardless, if your opponent is prepared, you generally end up just weakening your kingside pawn structure and missing out on opportunities to control center squares. In general, flank openings are a more advanced topic and as far as Grob's Attack goes, I would stay away. Even b4 (Sokolsky Opening) is more often fruitful.

@rnbqkbnr_pppppppp i dont think the grob is an easy line for someone to learn as a starter opening. you do need to know what to do to make it work

now im not saying i know it much myself but dont say it doesnt work just because you dont understand it

A friend of mine (very strong player) said (seriously): After each first move by white the game is a draw, be it 1.d4 or 1.h4. Only one move is lost for white, that's 1.g4.

@dragonofblood i dont believe that every move from white is nothing but a draw. even the computer engines show that isnt true

So what do the engines show? Some moves by white are winning? I didn't know that. Which ones are these?

Well, this is a side line.

I followed this good guide here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G98sGv2NSU

The point I was trying to make was that the attack never really advanced to a point to make it successful in about 95% of the games that I played here yesterday and today on Lichess.

At 1:21 he explains the attack should be "abandoned" if the opponent plays certain moves. The tutorial will end right at that point. Thus you end up with a strange pawn structure on the King side, I think this is exactly the point that Generic-Name above was trying to explain.
(Maybe there's a continuation after that, but it's not covered in that guide.)