@FourtyTwoFields said in #7:
> The Petroff is defensive, the Caro-Kann is quite aggreesive contrary to what people believe. Here is why:
I think there's a point that a lot of people miss which is that for black in particular, the openings that are "defensive" in the sense of being cramped and slow and giving white the chance to attack early on are often "aggressive" in the sense of being provocative, imbalanced and risky.
If black tries to stay on an even footing in terms of centre and development - by playing e5 and all the usual stuff against e4, say - then it takes a lot of careful buildup (or an unsound gambit) for white to get a serious attack going against accurate play. If they play the Sicilian or the Caro or the French, they gift white an early lead in development and the chance to start attacking straight out of the blocks, and bet on the fact that the attack's going to fail and leave white overcommitted and at a disadvantage in the later middlegame / endgame.
Essentially, black's normal role in chess is to be a counterpuncher, and the more counterpunching they want to do, the more punching they have to invite from white.