so you say that even if someone make few moves of computer cheating then you have so high tech systems to even detect that? Don't kid with me I have seen few players cheating only at critical points at various games and never get detected for it. And sf might think I am better or I am okay but that nowhere implies that I was really better. There are positions SF has no idea about it will give you great but you would be so uneasy to play it. I am not trying being rude of know it all but there are some thing which just disturbs you again and again and no one seems to care about it!!
When people offer draws in completely lost position, provided that I've got some time on the clock, I generally write them something along the lines of "Wow, what a generous offer! Let me think about it" and give them some time to contemplate their behavior
Dude I have you see I have 800+ games, never had any problems ever but recently these things have just shooted up and I became so desperate for help that I don't what to do.
> Don't kid with me I have seen few players cheating only at critical points at various games
That is true, some players do that. And I can check for that as well. But if you are suspecting that, claiming in your report that there were "perfect moves the whole game" is really counterproductive. Because then I am not thinking: "This person made a good report, let's check the reported player in depth." What I am thinking is: "This person does not know the first thing about cheating, let's go to the next report that is actually worth our time."
In your report, you should not lie or exaggerate. You cannot manipulate me into marking your opponent. If you think your opponent checked with the engine at a critical point in the game, state that in your report.
That is true, some players do that. And I can check for that as well. But if you are suspecting that, claiming in your report that there were "perfect moves the whole game" is really counterproductive. Because then I am not thinking: "This person made a good report, let's check the reported player in depth." What I am thinking is: "This person does not know the first thing about cheating, let's go to the next report that is actually worth our time."
In your report, you should not lie or exaggerate. You cannot manipulate me into marking your opponent. If you think your opponent checked with the engine at a critical point in the game, state that in your report.
Again I am not manipulating. And why is my report being made an evidence here? I am talking about this issue in general. Also there are other things I pointed what about them?
I was trying to help you, or rather the other people in this thread. You said:
> I reported many but seems lichess finds them innocent.
And I am merely explaining why we did not act on your reports and let all those suspected cheaters roam freely instead. As for the other things you pointed out: Similar to what happened with your report, I stopped reading as soon as I noticed that you had very little credibility. And I went on to the next thing that is more likely to be worth my time.
> I reported many but seems lichess finds them innocent.
And I am merely explaining why we did not act on your reports and let all those suspected cheaters roam freely instead. As for the other things you pointed out: Similar to what happened with your report, I stopped reading as soon as I noticed that you had very little credibility. And I went on to the next thing that is more likely to be worth my time.
Very good then thanks for your time anyways. Next time I will try to bring more things into your notice to "have a bit more credibility". Bdw if you play chess, I will wish this thing happen to you so that atleast you have a sense of what I have been talking to. I would stop here because who know now you might block me for being rude,!!
There is a difference between " Breaking the rules/Term of service" vs "Disrepect/ courtesy etc"
OP should read the rules first, and report only those break TOS.
OP should read the rules first, and report only those break TOS.
I think the key takeaway here is not "bring more things" but trying being more accurate in your reports and don't make exaggerated claims.
I have 800+games. I have lost to even 1200s even in the endgames but didn't report because they played it properly and I know my blunders. Never had problems before but when there are I am raising it. Doesn't really mean they have to be correct but you get my point I guess. Atleast i know when someone is making suspicious moves
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.