@DerDerDerDerDer said in #23:
> (...and I should answer your question - I do watch a lot of YouTube content creators and tournaments. I look at the analyses of my games. That is probably the extent of my study. I own no chess books.)
From noob to noob, my recommendation is, not looking at the whole analysis of your game(s), but "just" focus on the 1..3 worst moves or so, you made in the game (either "blunders" according to the lichess-game-analysis or just those moves with the largest drop of evaluation, according to the eval-graph). For me, I think, it helps most, understanding *why* those moves were bad moves - when I got it and when I feel like it, I might look at more moves than those 1..3, but most of the times I feel like "just" taking that info away from the game is, what helps me most.
> (...and I should answer your question - I do watch a lot of YouTube content creators and tournaments. I look at the analyses of my games. That is probably the extent of my study. I own no chess books.)
From noob to noob, my recommendation is, not looking at the whole analysis of your game(s), but "just" focus on the 1..3 worst moves or so, you made in the game (either "blunders" according to the lichess-game-analysis or just those moves with the largest drop of evaluation, according to the eval-graph). For me, I think, it helps most, understanding *why* those moves were bad moves - when I got it and when I feel like it, I might look at more moves than those 1..3, but most of the times I feel like "just" taking that info away from the game is, what helps me most.