Stockfish thinks gambits is inaccuracy?

1.d4 f5 2.e4?! : "inaccuracy. c4 was best."?

1.d4 d5 2.c4 e5?! : "Inaccuracy. e6 was best."?

?

Do not play with stockfish!
Just beat Carlsen!

@Steven6840 said in #1:
> 1.d4 f5 2.e4?! : "inaccuracy. c4 was best."?
>

ISTG this Stockfish says everything is an inaccuracy. There should be a feature where if it's an opening, it isn't an inaccuracy.

@viktheking said in #3:
> ISTG this Stockfish says everything is an inaccuracy. There should be a feature where if it's an opening, it isn't an inaccuracy.

yea, but

@ulviczkiadam said in #2:
> Do not play with stockfish!
> Just beat Carlsen!

Carlsen is one!

@TheKingClash said in #5:
> It gives away a pawn. Although white gets temporary compensation, black can usually develop safely and castle with perfect play, and White loses his temporary initiative. Black will then have an advantageous middle game wihh an extra pawn.

Yea.

with so many "exponential" possibilities stemming from so very few initial choices, I think deciding to play chess is some kind of inaccurate behavior.... (also funny captcha, i just had).

#5 It may not be especially good...but it is certainly NOT an "inaccuracy" (an even worse misnomer than usual with this stuff).

@Steven6840
Are you new to Lichess?
Because its been many time since I am seeing Stock fish calling Gambits as inaccurate and even mistakes. It's old story actually.

@Akbar2thegreat said in #9:
> @Steven6840
> Are you new to Lichess?
> Because its been many time since I am seeing Stock fish calling Gambits as inaccurate and even mistakes. It's old story actually.
My account was born in Jan this year