my tactics is like 2375. classical 1800. chess dot com like 1750. OK, I don't play many games.....but i study this game A LOT.
so after only like 13 moves this guy thinks I'm sus and resigns. I said he could report me, but he didn't want to. What? The first game we played was even after like 20 moves...no problem
I'm curious...which move is soo suspect? I think I made two decent moves, and the last pawn move was nice (not the best move)
Of course if he played another 10 moves I'll lose.....i'm horrible at blitz. YES I Know the 1400? is strange, but whatever....i know i'll lose a zillion games in time pressure and that's not my thing.
What are you thoughts?
<Comment deleted by user>
I mean, it is pretty sus. TBH
E5 is maybe what makes he thinking you are a cheater, but for me it seems like he did some stupid mistakes and you exploited it well. GG :D
I didn't realize the guy who thinks you are a cheater is an IM! Yikes ...
Well you beat a IM so that is sus
Yes, the guy I beat was an IM. So now maybe I should be a GM.
Here's the problem, to me.....He's a titled player, and this is not good sportmanship. If he thinks I'm cheating, report me. For the love of the game, report people!!! No problem. Or play the actual game, which is why I'm not too happy. He thinks I made a good move so he quits and says computer stuff...
That doesn't help the game. Doesn't grow the sport.
And it was on his stream, live
I don't even think I made a move that was even remotely "computerish". What other options did I have in my last move? I think the best move was moving your Queen...not the pawn.
So, OK...... I guess my opening prep is like GMish.
sweet....i'm turning pro, except i'm horrible and I wanted to play some decent players to learn. well, that didn't work.
The fact that you made this thread shows you are not a cheater. I know from personal experience that when you make a thread like this when someone says you are cheating is proof that you are not. A real cheater would not bother making a thread to discuss this. You played well dude, don't worry about it, take it as a compliment. Also the IM was not in a very bad position when he resigned, I don't know why he was thinking you were cheating, but it is apparent you are not.
"my tactics is like 2375. classical 1800... OK, I don't play many games.....but i study this game A LOT."
Are you me?
@QuanahAtagulkalu Ok first of all it doesn't work like that. Just means you beat one IM doesn't mean you are a GM.
I looked at your game it is pretty even. Some will say e5 is sus but I don't think so after all I would also find that move. Just opening up d file to take the bishop on d7, no big deal. It's not the best move anyway.
I don't know why that IM is accusing you, I don't really see anything wrong, it's a short game so that's why you have little mistakes and it's in the opening and pre midgame phase.
Just checked out his stream. I think the main reason he accuses you is because of your 1400 rating in blitz which he said you should be like 1800 which I agree but that doesn't mean you are cheating