Big difference in numbers of errors

Hi, I've been playing with humans for some time now, and I've noticed that computer analysis is very different from race to race.
I play contests with my peers (1600/1700 pts.) that end with analysis of 7-5-7 / 5-6-5 errors, and others that end with 2-1-0 / 1-1-1 errors. My first thought is that in a game played with 5-6-5 mistakes i'm a lot distracted, and in a race with 1-2-0 errors that i've played really good.
Is this wide discrepancy between different races normal, or errors calls other errors or what?

sometimes you play well, and punish blunders, sometimes you are punished, it is the life of a chess player online

It really depends on the type of position and number of moves and positions you have played before and many more factors. Ignore the computer.

#BeliefOnTheLordJesus

Yes, yours is a plausible hypothesis .
Perhaps the mistakes made in the initial phase of the game tend to multiply hyperbolically in computer analysis.
But I do not give up the analysis, indeed .. it is a pleasure almost equal to that of the game itself.