@A_Kireev said in #89:
> Therefore, it would be logical for both you with K = 20 and the master with K=10 to count the games with owners of K= 40 with a reduced K (for example, 5). A stable rating obtained in the fight against the holders of the same stable rating should not decrease sharply due to the fact that the opponent's rating is provisional.
Here I fully agree. My proposal was a bit different by looking at TPR instead of rating for people having no stable rating yet. People with a provisional rating/ rating based on few games harm too much the other ratings with the current system.
> Therefore, it would be logical for both you with K = 20 and the master with K=10 to count the games with owners of K= 40 with a reduced K (for example, 5). A stable rating obtained in the fight against the holders of the same stable rating should not decrease sharply due to the fact that the opponent's rating is provisional.
Here I fully agree. My proposal was a bit different by looking at TPR instead of rating for people having no stable rating yet. People with a provisional rating/ rating based on few games harm too much the other ratings with the current system.