@Sainagh1393 said in #10:
> what?
The Sämisch is a sort of Queen's Gambit setup with f3, e4, and Bd3.
چه بازی خوبی
Black has two major choices on move 4: (4...d5 and 4...c5) and a minor one in 4...Nc6, so play does not automatically lead to the position you refer to. Along the way there are a few deviations you skip. Black will always have a hard time to play for a win against a top player who will play solid with White, this has nothing to do with the "drawishness" of the 4.Qc2 Nimzo, in which fewer games end in draws than in the 4.e3 and even the 4.f3 variations.
@DeeTheta said in #7:
> 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 0-0 5. e4 d5 6. e5 Ne4 7. Bd3 c5 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. Nxd4 Nd7 10. Bf4 Qh4
>
> with theory going on on and my database giving 38% draws from 5. e4. Black only wins 1/4 of the games in that line, while white has multiple perpetuals on their hands. In the case of Abasov Gukesh, getting a draw with the black pieces would have stopped Gukesh from being the World Champion. 4. Qc2 is a solid, theoretical line that leads to a lot of draws and worked out positions at the high level. It isn't idiotic to say a plus of this system is to avoid easy draws.
@DeeTheta said in #7:
> 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 0-0 5. e4 d5 6. e5 Ne4 7. Bd3 c5 8. Nf3 cxd4 9. Nxd4 Nd7 10. Bf4 Qh4
>
> with theory going on on and my database giving 38% draws from 5. e4. Black only wins 1/4 of the games in that line, while white has multiple perpetuals on their hands. In the case of Abasov Gukesh, getting a draw with the black pieces would have stopped Gukesh from being the World Champion. 4. Qc2 is a solid, theoretical line that leads to a lot of draws and worked out positions at the high level. It isn't idiotic to say a plus of this system is to avoid easy draws.