lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.2d5+0.22c4+0.2e6+0.23Nf3+0.2c6+0.34g3+0.2dxc4+0.25Bg2+0.3Nf6+0.36O-O+0.3b50.07a4+0.3a6+0.48axb50.0cxb50.09Ne5−0.1Ra70.010Bc6+−0.4Nbd7??+1.6Blunder. Bd7 was best.10...Bd711Nc3??−0.3...Blunder. Bxb5 was best.11.Bxb5axb511...b4??+2.4Blunder. Rc7 was best.11...Rc712.d5b4[...]12Na4??+0.2...Blunder. Nb5 was best.12.Nb5Rb713.Rxa6[...]12...Be7+0.713Nxc4+0.9Qc7+1.314Bxd7+?−0.2...Mistake. Ne5 was best.14.Ne514...Bxd7−0.315Nab6−0.7Bb5−0.816Bf4−0.7Qc6−0.617Qb3−0.7O-O−0.718Rfc1−0.6Nd5−0.219Nxd5−0.3Qxd5−0.220Be3??−2.0...Blunder. Qc2 was best.20.Qc220...Rc8?!−0.9Inaccuracy. a5 was best.20...a521.Qd3a4[...]21Nd2−1.4Rxc1+−1.322Rxc1−1.2Ra8−1.123Qxd5−1.2exd5−1.124Rc7−1.2Bd6−1.225Rc1?!−2.3...Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best.25.Rb7Rc826.Rb6[...]25...Bxe2−2.226Nb3−2.6a5−2.727Bf4?!−4.2...Inaccuracy. Rc6 was best.27.Rc6Bf828.Nc1[...]27...Bxf4−4.128gxf4−3.9a4−3.829Na1?!−5.0...Inaccuracy. Re1 was best.29.Re1Bc430.Nc5[...]29...a3−4.930bxa3−5.2bxa3−5.031Rc5−5.5Bc4−5.132Rc7−5.5f5−5.533Kg2−5.3a2−5.534Kh3−6.2Re8−6.135Kh4−6.4Re1−6.136Kg5?!−8.3...Inaccuracy. Nc2 was best.36.Nc2Rc137.Ne3[...]36...Rxa1−8.837Rc8+−8.8Kf7−8.538Rc7+?#−16...Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ra8 was best.38.Ra8Rg1+39.Kxf5[...]38...Ke6−10.2
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/e1Nj7kkC"] [Date "2024.08.18"] [White "Mizrab"] [Black "em-as-in-emily"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "e1Nj7kkC"] [UTCDate "2024.08.18"] [UTCTime "18:56:56"] [WhiteElo "1677"] [BlackElo "1796"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-12"] [BlackRatingDiff "+10"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "E04"] [Opening "Catalan Opening: Open Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 c6 4. g3 dxc4 5. Bg2 Nf6 { E04 Catalan Opening: Open Defense } 6. O-O b5 7. a4 a6 8. axb5 cxb5 9. Ne5 Ra7 10. Bc6+ Nbd7?? { (-0.45 → 1.56) Blunder. Bd7 was best. } (10... Bd7) 11. Nc3?? { (1.56 → -0.32) Blunder. Bxb5 was best. } (11. Bxb5 axb5) 11... b4?? { (-0.32 → 2.44) Blunder. Rc7 was best. } (11... Rc7 12. d5 b4 13. Bxd7+ Bxd7 14. d6 Rc8 15. Rxa6 bxc3 16. bxc3 Ra8 17. Rxa8) 12. Na4?? { (2.44 → 0.19) Blunder. Nb5 was best. } (12. Nb5 Rb7 13. Rxa6 Rxb5 14. Bxb5 Bxa6 15. Bxa6 Bd6 16. Nxc4 Be7 17. Ne5 Qa5) 12... Be7 13. Nxc4 Qc7 14. Bxd7+? { (1.31 → -0.17) Mistake. Ne5 was best. } (14. Ne5) 14... Bxd7 15. Nab6 Bb5 16. Bf4 Qc6 17. Qb3 O-O 18. Rfc1 Nd5 19. Nxd5 Qxd5 20. Be3?? { (-0.24 → -1.99) Blunder. Qc2 was best. } (20. Qc2) 20... Rc8?! { (-1.99 → -0.90) Inaccuracy. a5 was best. } (20... a5 21. Qd3 a4 22. Nb6 Bxd3 23. Nxd5 exd5 24. exd3 Rfa8 25. Rc6 Rb7 26. Kg2) 21. Nd2 Rxc1+ 22. Rxc1 Ra8 23. Qxd5 exd5 24. Rc7 Bd6 25. Rc1?! { (-1.24 → -2.32) Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best. } (25. Rb7 Rc8 26. Rb6 Bf8 27. Bf4 Bxe2 28. Nb3 Rc2 29. Rb8 Rxb2 30. Nc1 g5) 25... Bxe2 26. Nb3 a5 27. Bf4?! { (-2.74 → -4.17) Inaccuracy. Rc6 was best. } (27. Rc6 Bf8 28. Nc1 Ba6 29. b3 a4 30. bxa4 Bc4 31. g4 Rxa4 32. Rb6 Ra5) 27... Bxf4 28. gxf4 a4 29. Na1?! { (-3.77 → -5.02) Inaccuracy. Re1 was best. } (29. Re1 Bc4 30. Nc5 a3 31. Ra1 g6 32. Kg2 Kg7 33. Kg3 Kf6 34. Nd7+ Ke6) 29... a3 30. bxa3 bxa3 31. Rc5 Bc4 32. Rc7 f5 33. Kg2 a2 34. Kh3 Re8 35. Kh4 Re1 36. Kg5?! { (-6.12 → -8.33) Inaccuracy. Nc2 was best. } (36. Nc2 Rc1 37. Ne3 a1=Q 38. Nxf5 Qa6 39. Rc6 Qxc6 40. Ne7+ Kf8 41. Nxc6 Bf1) 36... Rxa1 37. Rc8+ Kf7 38. Rc7+? { (-8.51 → Mate in 16) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ra8 was best. } (38. Ra8 Rg1+ 39. Kxf5 a1=Q 40. Rxa1 Rxa1 41. Kg5 Ra2 42. h4 Rxf2 43. h5 Rg2+) 38... Ke6 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
Mizrabem-as-in-emily
01
Mizrab −12
4 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
52 Average centipawn loss
82%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
em-as-in-emily +10
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
2 Blunders
26 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Catalan Opening: Open Defense
  1. em-as-in-emily (6...b5) Not very familiar with this variation tbh
  2. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) I only just noticed 11.Bxb5 was possible
  3. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) Qc7 or Qb6 to defend?
  4. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) Qc7 Bxb5 axb5 Nxb5 seems bad
  5. Mennonite 11...Qc7 12.d5 looks even stronger
  6. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) There is also the idea of b4, but I don't think I want to allow the knight in through a4
  7. Mennonite oh wait Qxe5 after d5
  8. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) Qb6 also prepares Bb7
  9. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) I'm concerned about Qb6 d5
  10. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) Wait, Rc7 is an option
  11. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) I forgot the bishop defends the a pawn
  12. em-as-in-emily (11.Nc3) eh not sure it's better though
  13. em-as-in-emily (11...b4) wait
  14. em-as-in-emily (11...b4) what am I doing
  15. em-as-in-emily (11...b4) simply Nb5 here
  16. em-as-in-emily (11...b4) I hung an exchange to save a pawn lol
  17. em-as-in-emily (12.Na4) oh thank goodness
  18. em-as-in-emily (13...Qc7) man I need more coffee, I'm playing this opening so poorly
  19. em-as-in-emily (14...Bxd7) well at least I've survived the attack
  20. em-as-in-emily (15...Bb5) I'm hoping for some good tactics on the knights in the future, this configuration looks unstable
  21. em-as-in-emily (20.Be3) Rc8 Nd2 Rxc1+ Rxc1 Qxb3 Nxb3 Bxe2 wins a pawn but not sure I want to go for that yet
  22. em-as-in-emily (20...Rc8) I don't see much better
  23. em-as-in-emily (20...Rc8) I think I'll avoid Qxb3 though since Qxd5 exd5 maintains a blockade of the d pawn
  24. em-as-in-emily (22.Rxc1) just noticed Bxe2 Rc8+ Bf8 Qxb4 could be dangerous
  25. em-as-in-emily (22.Rxc1) d5 then Bc5 could be a threat in some lines too
  26. em-as-in-emily (24...Bd6) Rc7 seems hasty
  27. Mennonite 28...Bc4 29.Ne2 a4 maybe
  28. Mennonite surprised not to see g6 instead of f5
  29. Mennonite gg
  30. em-as-in-emily ohh, 7...Bb7
  31. em-as-in-emily that's what I forgot
  32. em-as-in-emily I see why that's the main line after what happened in the game haha
  33. em-as-in-emily Thanks for the game Mizrab and good luck next week!
  34. Mizrab Thanks, you too. I was just reading your whispered comments, which will help me analyse