lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d40.0d5+0.32Nf3+0.3Nf6+0.33c4+0.2e6+0.24Nc30.0c5+0.35e3+0.1Be7+0.46Be20.0O-O+0.27O-O0.0Nc6+0.48a30.0b60.09Qc20.0Bb70.010Re1?!−0.6...Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best.10.dxc510...Rc8−0.211Qb1??−2.0...Blunder. dxc5 was best.11.dxc511...dxc4?!−1.2Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best.11...cxd412.cxd5dxc3[...]12dxc5−1.1Bxc5−1.213Rd1?!−1.7...Inaccuracy. Bxc4 was best.13.Bxc4Na514.Ba2[...]13...Qc7−1.814Nb5−2.3Qb8−2.215Bd2−2.5a6−2.416Nc3−3.0b5−2.717Ne4?!−4.1...Inaccuracy. Ng5 was best.17.Ng5Na518.b4[...]17...Nxe4−4.018Qxe4−4.1Na5??−1.3Blunder. Nd4 was best.18...Nd419.Qg4Nxe2+[...]19Qh4−1.4Nb3−1.320Ng5??−4.0...Blunder. Bc3 was best.20.Bc3f621.Rd7[...]20...h6−3.921Bc3−4.7hxg5−3.822Qxg5−3.6f6−3.723Qg4−4.1Rce8?−2.1Mistake. Rf7 was best.23...Rf724.Qh3Nxa1[...]24Ra2??−4.5...Blunder. Rd7 was best.24.Rd7Rf725.Rad1[...]24...Qc8−4.625a4−4.6e5−4.626Rd7−5.0Rf7−4.927Rxf7−5.0Qxg4−5.128Bxg4−5.0Kxf7−5.029axb5−5.0Rd8?−3.1Mistake. axb5 was best.29...axb530.Kf1Rd8[...]30bxa6−2.7Bxa6??+2.7Blunder. Bc6 was best.30...Bc631.h4Ra8[...]31Rxa6+2.7Rb8?!+3.7Inaccuracy. Nd2 was best.31...Nd232.Be2Ke7[...]32Be6++3.9Kg6+4.433Bxc4+4.3Bf8+5.234g3?!+3.8...Inaccuracy. Bxb3 was best.34.Bxb3Rxb335.Bxe5[...]34...Nc5+3.735Ra7+3.9Ne4?!+5.6Inaccuracy. Kh6 was best.35...Kh636.Bd5Nd3[...]36Bd3+5.6f5+5.537Bxe5+5.6Re8+5.638Ra6++5.6Kg5??#4Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kh7 was best.38...Kh739.Bd4Bb4[...]39Bf4+#4Kg4#440Kg2#3
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/cZhEG3Iw"] [Date "2023.10.21"] [White "CarlosMagnussen"] [Black "nosugar"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "cZhEG3Iw"] [UTCDate "2023.10.21"] [UTCTime "20:06:41"] [WhiteElo "1784"] [BlackElo "1929"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+78"] [BlackRatingDiff "-38"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "D40"] [Opening "Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. c4 e6 4. Nc3 c5 { D40 Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense } 5. e3 Be7 6. Be2 O-O 7. O-O Nc6 8. a3 b6 9. Qc2 Bb7 10. Re1?! { (0.04 → -0.59) Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best. } (10. dxc5) 10... Rc8 11. Qb1?? { (-0.16 → -2.00) Blunder. dxc5 was best. } (11. dxc5) 11... dxc4?! { (-2.00 → -1.23) Inaccuracy. cxd4 was best. } (11... cxd4 12. cxd5 dxc3 13. dxc6 Rxc6 14. bxc3 Nd5 15. c4 Nc3 16. Qd3 Nxe2+ 17. Qxe2 Qc7 18. Nd2) 12. dxc5 Bxc5 13. Rd1?! { (-1.16 → -1.75) Inaccuracy. Bxc4 was best. } (13. Bxc4 Na5 14. Ba2 Bxf3 15. gxf3 Bxa3 16. bxa3 Rxc3 17. Bb2 Rc5 18. Rc1 Rg5+ 19. Kh1 Qa8) 13... Qc7 14. Nb5 Qb8 15. Bd2 a6 16. Nc3 b5 17. Ne4?! { (-2.66 → -4.15) Inaccuracy. Ng5 was best. } (17. Ng5 Na5 18. b4 cxb3 19. Nce4 Nxe4 20. Nxe4 Bxe4 21. Qxe4 Nc4 22. Bc3 b2 23. Ra2 Rfd8) 17... Nxe4 18. Qxe4 Na5?? { (-4.08 → -1.33) Blunder. Nd4 was best. } (18... Nd4 19. Qg4 Nxe2+ 20. Kf1 Bxf3 21. Qxf3 Qe5 22. Qxe2 Qxb2 23. Qe1 Rfd8 24. Bc3 Qc2 25. Rdb1) 19. Qh4 Nb3 20. Ng5?? { (-1.26 → -4.00) Blunder. Bc3 was best. } (20. Bc3 f6 21. Rd7 Rc7 22. Rad1 Bd5 23. Rxc7 Qxc7 24. Qh3 Qb6 25. Qg4 Rf7 26. h4 Bf8) 20... h6 21. Bc3 hxg5 22. Qxg5 f6 23. Qg4 Rce8? { (-4.13 → -2.14) Mistake. Rf7 was best. } (23... Rf7 24. Qh3 Nxa1 25. Bh5 Rd8 26. Rxa1 Qd6 27. Re1 Be4 28. Qh4 g6 29. b4 cxb3 30. Qxe4) 24. Ra2?? { (-2.14 → -4.49) Blunder. Rd7 was best. } (24. Rd7 Rf7 25. Rad1 Bf8 26. Rxf7 Kxf7 27. h4 Nc5 28. h5 Be4 29. h6 Qc7 30. Bf3 Bxf3) 24... Qc8 25. a4 e5 26. Rd7 Rf7 27. Rxf7 Qxg4 28. Bxg4 Kxf7 29. axb5 Rd8? { (-5.03 → -3.09) Mistake. axb5 was best. } (29... axb5 30. Kf1 Rd8 31. Be1 Be4 32. Ra6 Kf8 33. h4 Rd6 34. Ra2 Ke7 35. Be2 Bd3 36. Ra8) 30. bxa6 Bxa6?? { (-2.73 → 2.66) Blunder. Bc6 was best. } (30... Bc6 31. h4 Ra8 32. Bh5+ Ke7 33. Bd1 Kd7 34. g4 Bd6 35. h5 Kc7 36. Kh2 Nc5 37. a7) 31. Rxa6 Rb8?! { (2.66 → 3.66) Inaccuracy. Nd2 was best. } (31... Nd2 32. Be2 Ke7 33. h4 Ne4 34. g4 Nxc3 35. bxc3 Bd6 36. Bxc4 Rc8 37. Ra7+ Rc7 38. Ra4) 32. Be6+ Kg6 33. Bxc4 Bf8 34. g3?! { (5.16 → 3.80) Inaccuracy. Bxb3 was best. } (34. Bxb3 Rxb3 35. Bxe5 Rb5 36. Bc3 Bb4 37. Kf1 Bxc3 38. bxc3 Kf5 39. Ke2 g5 40. h3 Rb3) 34... Nc5 35. Ra7 Ne4?! { (3.87 → 5.59) Inaccuracy. Kh6 was best. } (35... Kh6 36. Bd5 Nd3 37. Ra8 Rxa8 38. Bxa8 f5 39. Bd5 e4 40. Bc4 g5 41. Kf1 Kh5 42. h3) 36. Bd3 f5 37. Bxe5 Re8 38. Ra6+ Kg5?? { (5.60 → Mate in 4) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kh7 was best. } (38... Kh7 39. Bd4 Bb4 40. Bxe4 Rxe4 41. Kg2 Be7 42. h3 g5 43. Kf3 Bb4 44. Ra7+ Kh6 45. Rb7) 39. Bf4+ Kg4 40. Kg2 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
CarlosMagnussennosugar
10
CarlosMagnussen +78
4 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
3 Blunders
39 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
nosugar −38
3 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
64 Average centipawn loss
79%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense
  1. CarlosMagnussen let's see if this works. probably not...
  2. CarlosMagnussen maybe some perpetual chances?
  3. CarlosMagnussen his king is pretty weak, but I'm running out of firepower
  4. CarlosMagnussen bishop on e2 is really useless
  5. CarlosMagnussen Ra8 was probably better
  6. CarlosMagnussen now I'm not lost (hopefully)
  7. gavalanche20 (34.g3) Wow this is quite the turnaround
  8. gavalanche20 (34.g3) e5 was also hanging on the previous move no?
  9. CarlosMagnussen there was Bxe5...
  10. CarlosMagnussen terrible time management and zero focus. not great way to play in this tournament
  11. gavalanche20 (39.Bf4+) Ooo mate in two?
  12. gavalanche20 (39.Bf4+) Ah not quite if Kg4
  13. EdeTede mate in 4
  14. EdeTede That Rook d8 move... :/
  15. nosugar I totally missed that Rd8 will not work as bishop is protecting d1 square
  16. CarlosMagnussen turning point was of course giving back material. that pawn was nowhere near dangerous as it looked
  17. nosugar Yeah, agree.
  18. EdeTede It was hard to play 30. Bc8 because of the rook move though
  19. CarlosMagnussen it kinda looked scary, but that diagonal a8 was protected and I didn't have nearly as much pieces as I would need to
  20. EdeTede it looks like it leaves that pawns run completely free
  21. CarlosMagnussen there was multiple good moves in that situation
  22. CarlosMagnussen it was hope chess at its best :-D
  23. CarlosMagnussen nosugar: if you want to share your thoughts with spectators during game, just tag /w before your message and they will see your message
  24. CarlosMagnussen but not your opponent
  25. EdeTede and hope that you've typed "/w" properly
  26. CarlosMagnussen I kinda use it to show spectators how empty my head is during my game
  27. CarlosMagnussen true :-D
  28. EdeTede you did say that you hoped you weren't lost when you were +5... :)
  29. nosugar ah cool. I kinda wanted to share my frustration at times haha
  30. EdeTede you only really missed one thing though
  31. CarlosMagnussen yeah, I was almost sure that I'm fine at that point, but with the way I played I was of course not sure
  32. EdeTede The knight sacrifice wasn't as promising as maybe it first appeared
  33. CarlosMagnussen Am i missing mate in 1, is my king on the same diagonal as my rook and his bishop? wouldn't be that surprising
  34. nosugar always uncomfortable when knight is sacrificed on the king side. easy to miss those mates in 1
  35. CarlosMagnussen no, it was not. it was just desparate move in bad situation. somehow I won that game, but with no disrespect to my opponent,
  36. CarlosMagnussen it was not won by skill
  37. CarlosMagnussen yeah, it would be promising with LSB on some attacking square and on on e2 doing nothing
  38. nosugar Yeah, you definitely needed more space for your bishops
  39. nosugar anyway, have to go! gg
  40. CarlosMagnussen I hoped that you would play e6 d5 Nf6 Bb4, which didn't happen
  41. EdeTede maybe if you both used your time more appropriately haha
  42. CarlosMagnussen there was time? haha
  43. EdeTede You finished with more than you started haha
  44. CarlosMagnussen yeah, I was kinda aware of that
  45. CarlosMagnussen hope you all enjoyed my recent lesson of How not to