lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d40.0d5+0.32c4+0.3c6+0.33Nc3+0.2Nf6+0.34Nf3+0.3dxc4+0.25a4+0.1Bf5+0.46e3+0.3e6+0.27Bxc4+0.2Bb4+0.38O-O+0.4O-O+0.49h3+0.2Ne4+0.210Nxe4+0.2Bxe4+0.211Be2+0.1Nd7+0.212Bd2+0.1Bd6+0.213Bc3+0.1Nf6+0.414Bd30.0Bd5?!+0.9Inaccuracy. Bc7 was best.14...Bc715.Bxe4Nxe4[...]15Nd2+0.8c5+0.916e4?!0.0...Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best.16.dxc516...cxd40.017Bxd40.0Bb4??+4.7Blunder. Bc6 was best.17...Bc618.Bc3Qc7[...]18exd5+4.7Qxd5+4.519Nf3+4.6Rad8+4.420Bxf6+4.1Qxd3?!+6.0Inaccuracy. gxf6 was best.20...gxf621.Be2Qe4[...]21Bxd8+5.8Rxd8+5.822Qxd3+6.0Rxd3+5.7
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/TFz84l9I"] [Date "2023.09.10"] [White "DosDebug"] [Black "kanishkparmar"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "TFz84l9I"] [UTCDate "2023.09.10"] [UTCTime "08:56:51"] [WhiteElo "1793"] [BlackElo "1744"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+15"] [BlackRatingDiff "-10"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D19"] [Opening "Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Dutch Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 dxc4 5. a4 Bf5 6. e3 e6 7. Bxc4 Bb4 8. O-O { D19 Slav Defense: Czech Variation, Dutch Variation } O-O 9. h3 Ne4 10. Nxe4 Bxe4 11. Be2 Nd7 12. Bd2 Bd6 13. Bc3 Nf6 14. Bd3 Bd5?! { (0.00 → 0.86) Inaccuracy. Bc7 was best. } (14... Bc7 15. Bxe4 Nxe4 16. Qb3 Rb8 17. Bb4 Re8 18. Bc5 a5 19. Ba7 Ra8 20. Bc5) 15. Nd2 c5 16. e4?! { (0.94 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. dxc5 was best. } (16. dxc5) 16... cxd4 17. Bxd4 Bb4?? { (0.00 → 4.65) Blunder. Bc6 was best. } (17... Bc6 18. Bc3 Qc7 19. Nc4 Bh2+ 20. Kh1 Nxe4 21. Bxg7 Nxf2+ 22. Rxf2 Kxg7 23. Qg4+ Kh8 24. Bxh7) 18. exd5 Qxd5 19. Nf3 Rad8 20. Bxf6 Qxd3?! { (4.11 → 5.98) Inaccuracy. gxf6 was best. } (20... gxf6 21. Be2 Qe4 22. Qb3 Kh8 23. Qc4 f5 24. Rfd1 Qxc4 25. Bxc4 Be7 26. g3 Rxd1+ 27. Rxd1) 21. Bxd8 Rxd8 22. Qxd3 Rxd3 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
DosDebugkanishkparmar
10
DosDebug +15
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
13 Average centipawn loss
96%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
kanishkparmar −10
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
40 Average centipawn loss
79%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Slav Defense: Czech Variation
  1. nic_west o7
  2. nic_west (13...Nf6) not a fan of these bishops. I think I would prefer to be black here.
  3. nic_west (14.Bd5) Nd2 with e4 coming next turn?
  4. nic_west if black pushes c5 looking for a lsb escape route, e4 bc6 e5 forking the N an B
  5. nic_west maybe 14...Bd5 was a mistake?
  6. nic_west e5 dxe5 runs into the same fork
  7. nic_west (15...c5) e5 c4? Bc2 Bc6 e5
  8. nic_west (16.e4) cxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 e5
  9. nic_west (16.e4) can black just sac his bishop? cxd4 Bxd4 Bh2 kxh2 Bc6 Bxf6 Qxf6, feels like no
  10. nic_west (16.e4) cxd4 Bxd4 Bc5 e5 Bxe5 Bxe5 Qxd3
  11. nic_west wins a pawn for black?
  12. nic_west after Qxd3 Bxf6 gxf6 Qg4+ kh8 Rad1
  13. nic_west Bc6* in the line above
  14. nic_west (17.Bb4) exd5 Qxd5 Nf3
  15. rojazu go Dos
  16. rojazu (19). 17. ...Bb4 is a catastrophic blunder. why not just Bc6?
  17. rojazu (19) instead of Nf3 (also fine) i thought Bxf6 Qxd3 Qg4! was interesting. threatening Qxb4 and a mate, obviously
  18. nic_west I think it was hard to see past the fork on e5
  19. rojazu so white recovers the piece
  20. rojazu (21) Bxd8 can be played
  21. nic_west yup nice move
  22. rojazu queens will come off here as well
  23. rojazu is totally winning
  24. rojazu (21) lets say Rxd8 Qxd3 Rxd3 then Rd1 gets another rook off as well due to back rank stuff
  25. rojazu gg
  26. nic_west wp both gg
  27. kanishkparmar How did I not see 17...Bc6?
  28. DosDebug Yeah I think Bc6 instead of Bb4 would have been fine for black
  29. DosDebug I was actually expecting that you will play Bc6
  30. DosDebug But when I saw Bb4 first I looked for what I might have missed but didn't see
  31. nic_west wasn't that the point of c5?
  32. DosDebug Yeah c5 was to give bishop a square
  33. DosDebug I was actually calculating my variation and in the end material would have been equal but black will be missing their h7 pawn
  34. DosDebug But I think black having a knight shouldn't be too much problem at all
  35. nic_west what did you calculate? I had you down a pawn after the exchange
  36. DosDebug So if after cxd4 Bxd4 Bc6 - e5 Bxe5 Bxh7+ Nxh7 and Bxe5
  37. DosDebug But I guess that would have been very devastating for me
  38. DosDebug Well luckily that didn't happen :D
  39. nic_west shit yeah you lose a knight at the end of the line
  40. nic_west I would not have seen that far
  41. DosDebug Yeah neither do I :P
  42. nic_west the line after 17...Bc6 Bc3 Qc7 Nc4 is fairly wild