lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2g6+0.52d4+0.5Bg7+0.53f4+0.4d6+0.34Nf3+0.2c5+0.25dxc5+0.1Qa5++0.36Bd2+0.1Qxc5+0.27Nc3+0.1Nh6?+1.4Mistake. Nf6 was best.7...Nf68.Bd3O-O[...]8h3+1.4O-O+1.89g4+2.0f5?!+3.1Inaccuracy. Kh8 was best.9...Kh810.Qe2Nc6[...]10gxf5+2.8gxf5+3.111e5??+1.1...Blunder. Rg1 was best.11.Rg111...dxe5+1.412fxe5?!+0.8...Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best.12.Nxe512...Nf7+0.813Qe2?!+0.2...Inaccuracy. b4 was best.13.b413...Nxe5+0.214Nxe50.0Qxe5−0.115O-O-O−0.2Nc6−0.216Qg2−0.6e6??+1.3Blunder. f4 was best.16...f417.Rg117Rg1+1.3Kh8+1.318Bc4?!+0.5...Inaccuracy. Kb1 was best.18.Kb118...Qf6?!+1.3Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best.18...Bd719Rde1?!+0.5...Inaccuracy. Kb1 was best.19.Kb1Na519...Ne5??+2.7Blunder. f4 was best.19...f420.Kb120h4??−3.3...Blunder. Qxg7+ was best.20.Qxg7+20...Nxc4−3.421Bf4−3.7Bh6−3.222Bg5−3.0Bxg5+−2.523hxg5−2.3Qg6−2.524Rh1−2.5Nd6??+2.9Blunder. Rg8 was best.24...Rg825.Rxh7+Kxh7[...]25Rh6+2.9Qg7+2.726Reh1+2.5Rf7?+4.7Mistake. Nf7 was best.26...Nf727.Rxh7+Qxh7[...]27g6+4.5Re7?!+6.2Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best.27...Bd728.gxf7Nxf7[...]28Rxh7++6.1Qxh7+6.029Rxh7++6.1Rxh7+5.930gxh7+5.9Bd7+5.931Qg5+5.5Bc6+5.432Qe7+4.6Ne4+4.833Nxe4?!+3.3...Inaccuracy. Ne2 was best.33.Ne2Re834.Qf7[...]33...Bxe4+3.334Qxe6?+1.5...Mistake. c4 was best.34.c4Bc635.b4[...]34...Kxh7+1.235a3+1.1Rg8+1.036Qe7++0.8Rg7+0.737Qc5?!+0.1...Inaccuracy. Qh4+ was best.37.Qh4+Kg638.Qg3+[...]37...a6+0.438b4+0.4Rg2+0.439c3+0.2Kg6+0.240Qe30.0Kh50.041c40.0Kg40.042a40.0Rc2+0.043Kd10.0Rb2?!+0.6Inaccuracy. Rxc4 was best.43...Rxc444.Qg1+Kf4[...]44Qc3+0.1Rg2+0.445b5+0.3axb5+0.446axb5+0.4Bf3++0.747Ke1?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Kc1 was best.47.Kc1Rg1+48.Kb2[...]47...Be4?!+0.8Inaccuracy. Kg3 was best.47...Kg348.Qg7+Bg4[...]48c5+0.6Rc2?!+1.2Inaccuracy. Rg1+ was best.48...Rg1+49Qd4+1.0Kf3+1.050Qb4?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Kd1 was best.50.Kd1Rf250...Re2++0.351Kd1+0.4Bc2++0.452Kc1+0.3Be4+0.453Qc4+0.4f4+0.454Qc3+0.0Re3+0.255Qc40.0Kf2+0.356Kd20.0Rd3+0.057Kc10.0Re3+0.258Qd40.0Kg3?!+0.6Inaccuracy. Kf1 was best.58...Kf159.c6Re1+[...]59Qg7++0.1Kh2??+2.6Blunder. Kf2 was best.59...Kf260Qh6+??+0.3...Blunder. Qg4 was best.60.Qg460...Kg3+0.461Qg5++0.3Kf3+0.462Kb20.0Re2+0.063Kc30.0Rc2+0.064Kd4+0.1Rd2+0.065Kc30.0Rc2+0.066Kb40.0Ke3+0.167Ka50.0Rg20.068Qh60.0Rg4+0.469Qe60.0Rg20.070c60.0bxc60.071bxc60.0Rc20.072Qb3+0.0Kd20.073Qb4+0.0Ke30.074c70.0f30.075Qb3+0.0Kd20.076Qxc2+0.0Bxc20.077c8=Q0.0f20.078Qf80.0Ke30.079Qe7+0.0Be40.080Qf60.0Ke20.081Qxf2+0.0Kxf20.0
½-½
Insufficient material • Draw
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/R7yknkvg"] [Date "2024.10.13"] [White "mkubecek"] [Black "SedNomini"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "R7yknkvg"] [UTCDate "2024.10.13"] [UTCTime "18:00:37"] [WhiteElo "1783"] [BlackElo "1678"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-4"] [BlackRatingDiff "+4"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B06"] [Opening "Modern Defense: Three Pawns Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 g6 2. d4 Bg7 3. f4 { B06 Modern Defense: Three Pawns Attack } d6 4. Nf3 c5 5. dxc5 Qa5+ 6. Bd2 Qxc5 7. Nc3 Nh6? { (0.13 → 1.43) Mistake. Nf6 was best. } (7... Nf6 8. Bd3 O-O 9. Qe2 Nc6 10. O-O-O Nb4 11. Bc4 d5 12. Bb3) 8. h3 O-O 9. g4 f5?! { (1.98 → 3.13) Inaccuracy. Kh8 was best. } (9... Kh8 10. Qe2 Nc6 11. O-O-O Ng8 12. Kb1 Qb6 13. a3 Rb8 14. f5 Nf6 15. Bc1) 10. gxf5 gxf5 11. e5?? { (3.10 → 1.10) Blunder. Rg1 was best. } (11. Rg1) 11... dxe5 12. fxe5?! { (1.37 → 0.76) Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best. } (12. Nxe5) 12... Nf7 13. Qe2?! { (0.80 → 0.18) Inaccuracy. b4 was best. } (13. b4) 13... Nxe5 14. Nxe5 Qxe5 15. O-O-O Nc6 16. Qg2 e6?? { (-0.59 → 1.28) Blunder. f4 was best. } (16... f4 17. Rg1) 17. Rg1 Kh8 18. Bc4?! { (1.34 → 0.53) Inaccuracy. Kb1 was best. } (18. Kb1) 18... Qf6?! { (0.53 → 1.29) Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } (18... Bd7) 19. Rde1?! { (1.29 → 0.45) Inaccuracy. Kb1 was best. } (19. Kb1 Na5) 19... Ne5?? { (0.45 → 2.68) Blunder. f4 was best. } (19... f4 20. Kb1) 20. h4?? { (2.68 → -3.34) Blunder. Qxg7+ was best. } (20. Qxg7+) 20... Nxc4 21. Bf4 Bh6 22. Bg5 Bxg5+ 23. hxg5 Qg6 24. Rh1 Nd6?? { (-2.55 → 2.87) Blunder. Rg8 was best. } (24... Rg8 25. Rxh7+ Kxh7 26. Rh1+ Kg7 27. Rh6 Ne5 28. Rxg6+ Kxg6 29. Qg1 Nf7 30. Qc5) 25. Rh6 Qg7 26. Reh1 Rf7? { (2.54 → 4.65) Mistake. Nf7 was best. } (26... Nf7 27. Rxh7+ Qxh7 28. g6 Qxh1+ 29. Qxh1+ Kg7 30. Qh7+ Kf6 31. g7 Bd7 32. gxf8=R) 27. g6 Re7?! { (4.53 → 6.17) Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } (27... Bd7 28. gxf7 Nxf7 29. Rxh7+ Qxh7 30. Rxh7+ Kxh7 31. Qxb7 Rd8 32. Qxa7 Kg6 33. a4) 28. Rxh7+ Qxh7 29. Rxh7+ Rxh7 30. gxh7 Bd7 31. Qg5 Bc6 32. Qe7 Ne4 33. Nxe4?! { (4.81 → 3.26) Inaccuracy. Ne2 was best. } (33. Ne2 Re8 34. Qf7 e5 35. Qxf5 Kg7 36. b3 Nf6 37. Ng3 Nxh7 38. Qg4+ Kh8) 33... Bxe4 34. Qxe6? { (3.29 → 1.50) Mistake. c4 was best. } (34. c4 Bc6 35. b4 a6 36. a4 Be4 37. Kb2 b5 38. axb5 axb5 39. cxb5 Rb8) 34... Kxh7 35. a3 Rg8 36. Qe7+ Rg7 37. Qc5?! { (0.72 → 0.09) Inaccuracy. Qh4+ was best. } (37. Qh4+ Kg6 38. Qg3+ Kh6 39. Qh2+ Kg5 40. b4 a6 41. Qg3+ Kf6 42. Qc3+ Kf7) 37... a6 38. b4 Rg2 39. c3 Kg6 40. Qe3 Kh5 41. c4 Kg4 42. a4 Rc2+ 43. Kd1 Rb2?! { (0.00 → 0.58) Inaccuracy. Rxc4 was best. } (43... Rxc4 44. Qg1+ Kf4 45. Qh2+ Kg5 46. Qg3+ Kh5 47. Ke2 Rc2+ 48. Ke1 Rg2 49. Qc7) 44. Qc3 Rg2 45. b5 axb5 46. axb5 Bf3+ 47. Ke1?! { (0.65 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Kc1 was best. } (47. Kc1 Rg1+ 48. Kb2 Rg2+ 49. Kb3 f4 50. Qg7+ Kh3 51. Qh6+ Kg3 52. c5 Be4) 47... Be4?! { (0.00 → 0.82) Inaccuracy. Kg3 was best. } (47... Kg3 48. Qg7+ Bg4 49. Qd4 f4 50. c5 Rh2 51. Qd3+ Bf3 52. Qg6+ Bg4) 48. c5 Rc2?! { (0.62 → 1.24) Inaccuracy. Rg1+ was best. } (48... Rg1+) 49. Qd4 Kf3 50. Qb4?! { (1.01 → 0.03) Inaccuracy. Kd1 was best. } (50. Kd1 Rf2) 50... Re2+ 51. Kd1 Bc2+ 52. Kc1 Be4 53. Qc4 f4 54. Qc3+ Re3 55. Qc4 Kf2 56. Kd2 Rd3+ 57. Kc1 Re3 58. Qd4 Kg3?! { (0.00 → 0.55) Inaccuracy. Kf1 was best. } (58... Kf1 59. c6 Re1+ 60. Kb2 bxc6 61. bxc6 Re2+ 62. Kb3 f3 63. c7 Bf5 64. Qc5) 59. Qg7+ Kh2?? { (0.06 → 2.59) Blunder. Kf2 was best. } (59... Kf2) 60. Qh6+?? { (2.59 → 0.27) Blunder. Qg4 was best. } (60. Qg4) 60... Kg3 61. Qg5+ Kf3 62. Kb2 Re2+ 63. Kc3 Rc2+ 64. Kd4 Rd2+ 65. Kc3 Rc2+ 66. Kb4 Ke3 67. Ka5 Rg2 68. Qh6 Rg4 69. Qe6 Rg2 70. c6 bxc6 71. bxc6 Rc2 72. Qb3+ Kd2 73. Qb4+ Ke3 74. c7 f3 75. Qb3+ Kd2 76. Qxc2+ Bxc2 77. c8=Q f2 78. Qf8 Ke3 79. Qe7+ Be4 80. Qf6 Ke2 81. Qxf2+ Kxf2 { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
8 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
3 Blunders
33 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
7 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
4 Blunders
33 Average centipawn loss
84%Accuracy
  1. Saturnitus Good luck Michal!
  2. Saturnitus Bit of a weird start
  3. Saturnitus See if blk can make something of it. Certainly the easier development
  4. Silkthewanderer Go Sed
  5. Silkthewanderer This really looks like White trying to be a bit too clever. I think there are many more convincing ways to attack 1. ...g6
  6. Silkthewanderer I tried my hardest to lose against 1. ...b6 earlier this season and this reminds me a lot of that
  7. Silkthewanderer And f5 is a move I really like for Black. I am a bit worried about discoveries against the Nh5...
  8. Silkthewanderer ...but positionally it is absolutely the best treatmenr
  9. glbert go sednomini!
  10. Saturnitus Move to check 11. Bd3?
  11. Saturnitus It feels like white needs to untangle
  12. glbert would black mind a Q-exchange?
  13. glbert looks like black does not.
  14. Saturnitus Be6 coulda been good
  15. jcarmody (20...Nxc4) Also, go Sed!
  16. jcarmody (26.Reh1) will this end up trading two Rs for the Q?
  17. Saturnitus Was 26 g6 worth looking at?
  18. Saturnitus Oh boy, game back on
  19. Scarff Rxh7+ Rxh7 gxh7 comes with Qg8 as a threat, so Kxh7 forced? Then Qh2+ forks and it's over?
  20. jcarmody (28...Qxh7) Well, that's not as nice as 2 Rs for a Q
  21. Saturnitus Seems right to me Scarff
  22. Scarff Ah, missed this to defend! But still it feels winning for white
  23. Saturnitus Qd2 looks good now
  24. Scarff Blacks pieces are too weak, so I feel like something will drop eventually
  25. glbert i would still take black, but i am not necessarily known to make smart choices.
  26. jcarmody (35...rg8) :d
  27. glbert jcarmody can believe it.
  28. Saturnitus Not sure now, i thought there was a chance to swap ghe h7 pawn for the blk knight
  29. Saturnitus Is this just a draw now?
  30. jcarmody (53...f4) oooh. could Sed have traded the R & B for a chance to promote?
  31. jcarmody (53...f4) probably no
  32. Saturnitus I think that was a trap well avoided
  33. jcarmody (56.Kd2) this looks like there's a chance to trade the R for Q somehow?
  34. Saturnitus I thought takes on move 57 was ok?
  35. Saturnitus Mebbe sraw
  36. Saturnitus Draw
  37. Inter-temporal (58.Qd4) tricky
  38. jcarmody (67...Rg2) I don't like this
  39. jcarmody (67...Rg2) but, I'm dumb
  40. Inter-temporal (69...Rg2) i'm remembering a fortress with R+P v Q ( if Black trades the B&P for white's 2Ps.)
  41. Inter-temporal (74.c7) uh oh
  42. jcarmody (77.c8=Q) uh oh is right!
  43. Saturnitus Wow, still not betting
  44. Saturnitus Gg both
  45. Saturnitus Some battle!
  46. jcarmody that wins the round for us
  47. jcarmody gg
  48. mkubecek Messed up twice, I'm afraid. :-(
  49. SedNomini So which position were you looking at?
  50. SedNomini I've never really played the modern very much, definitely not this aggressive Queen opening
  51. mkubecek After 45... axb5, I decided that keeping the a-pawn would be better... and then went and played axb5 like a complete [censored].
  52. SedNomini lol
  53. mkubecek If I had the a-pawn, the bishop couldn't prevent a6.
  54. SedNomini I guess maybe that would have changed the queening square to possibly be b8 the opposite color square
  55. SedNomini that's true too
  56. mkubecek Depends on whether you would take - but if not, then the b6 pawn would be a target.
  57. SedNomini yeah either way that looks hard to hold
  58. mkubecek Losing ~6 minutes due to a silent disconnect didn't exactly help either. But that's not an excuse, I only got into a trouble once or twice.
  59. SedNomini so if I couldn't get anything going, then either I would have to play b6 at some point, or you can just play b6 yourself and then a5, a 6
  60. SedNomini That was a really cool tempo count with the queen sacrifice, I almost played it and than made myself calculate it out completely
  61. SedNomini on 53
  62. mkubecek Had to try it... but it was too obvious to look like a blunder I guess. :-)
  63. mkubecek That's another reason why I should have kept the a-pawn.
  64. SedNomini I don't think I ever had a win in the end game, I think I was always playing for a draw
  65. mkubecek If I had a-pawn left, after the Q for B+R trade your king would be way too far.
  66. mkubecek So that getting under your pawn would suffice.
  67. SedNomini I was always looking at when I would either have to sac a piece for the pawn or when I would sac both pieces for the queen
  68. mkubecek My guess is after 46. axb5 I wasn't winning either.
  69. SedNomini crazy that the end game really started in earnest at like move 33, I was pretty sure you were winning there
  70. mkubecek That's why I wanted to have the pawns advanced enough.
  71. mkubecek So that trade of Q for R+B would be winning.
  72. mkubecek But after f4 it never seemed to work any more.
  73. SedNomini I figured there had to be a better way to advance the two connected pawns and they should have been faster than your three on two, I thought
  74. SedNomini but maybe I'm wrong
  75. SedNomini Half of me wanted to put my rook on f8, and say I don't care what else you take, I'm pushing the f pawn no matter what
  76. SedNomini but it didn't work out that way
  77. mkubecek My advantage was that when you lost the queen, your pieces were undeveloped and the king was naked.
  78. SedNomini where I felt the same way in the opening
  79. mkubecek But I suspect I could have made more out of it.
  80. SedNomini where you had more king safety, I felt I had a more active king that hsould have been able to escort the pawn
  81. mkubecek King safety is extremely important when you have pieces against a queen.
  82. SedNomini true, but so is king activity in the end game?
  83. SedNomini probably the most terrible move of the game had to be, 26. ...rf7, just terrible
  84. mkubecek Yes, the endgame is different. But you still need to keep your pieces connected - which you did, sadly.
  85. SedNomini I figured it would probably be two rooks versus queen,
  86. SedNomini that was probably my salvation in the endgame was the fact that everything stayed coordinated
  87. mkubecek I don't think 26... Rf7 was best but I think I already had an upper hand there.
  88. SedNomini I kept wanting to get more aggressive with the rook and attack your pawns, but it always seemed to risk to disconnect
  89. SedNomini alrighty, shall we consult the digital overlords for confirmation or did you want to review the opening or middle game more?
  90. mkubecek Yes, let's look what SF has to say...
  91. SedNomini wow... even at move 14
  92. SedNomini why in the world would they sayf4 is better than e6 at move 16?
  93. SedNomini shoot lol, move 24, I almost played Nd6 too
  94. mkubecek I guess after f4 I would soon have other worries than how to attack your king.
  95. mkubecek And I was so proud of 11. e5 :-)
  96. SedNomini weird
  97. SedNomini huh, 46, doesn't show a difference between a or cx
  98. mkubecek Looks like I messed up much earlier... should have kept the knight and should have kept your king away from the f-pawn.
  99. SedNomini lol, the whole endgame from 37 on, all draw basically
  100. SedNomini wow...move 43, it says taking on c4 is totally fine, I thought for sure that was your trick
  101. SedNomini lol, oh geeeeeeesh, so simple
  102. SedNomini Queen is pinned....
  103. SedNomini neither has better than to just repeat move they say
  104. mkubecek I saw that (Rxc4 Qe2+ Bf3) but I believed I had other way to punish Rxc4.
  105. mkubecek I was wrong, apparently.
  106. SedNomini lol, I believed you
  107. SedNomini my thought was keep it connected, and don't take risks
  108. SedNomini stay coordinated
  109. SedNomini Alrighty, I'm off to watch sports ball, thanks for the game, it was fun. See you next time
  110. mkubecek See you.