30:00
30:00
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
in local browser
1-0
Checkmate • White is victorious
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/L7WbQDA9"]
[Date "2023.11.24"]
[White "Estructuralista"]
[Black "zid2000"]
[Result "1-0"]
[GameId "L7WbQDA9"]
[UTCDate "2023.11.24"]
[UTCTime "20:00:51"]
[WhiteElo "1784"]
[BlackElo "1967"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "+31"]
[BlackRatingDiff "-20"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "1800+30"]
[ECO "D31"]
[Opening "Semi-Slav Defense: Marshall Gambit"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 c6 4. e4 { D31 Semi-Slav Defense: Marshall Gambit } dxc4 5. Bxc4 Nf6?! { (0.73 → 1.81) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (5... b5 6. Bb3 b4 7. Nce2 Nf6 8. Qc2 a5 9. Nf3 Ba6 10. Be3) 6. Nf3 Nbd7 7. O-O Be7 8. Qc2 O-O 9. a3 c5?! { (1.53 → 2.34) Inaccuracy. Re8 was best. } (9... Re8 10. Bd3 Nf8 11. e5 Nd5 12. Ne4 h6 13. h4 Bd7 14. Re1 b6 15. Bd2 c5 16. dxc5) 10. dxc5 Bxc5 11. Bg5? { (2.62 → 0.98) Mistake. e5 was best. } (11. e5 Ne8 12. Rd1 Qc7 13. Nb5 Qb8 14. Bf4 Be7 15. Ba2 a6 16. Nbd4 g6 17. Qd2 Ng7) 11... Qc7 12. Rfe1? { (1.34 → -0.30) Mistake. Nb5 was best. } (12. Nb5 Qb8) 12... Bxf2+?! { (-0.30 → 0.52) Inaccuracy. Ng4 was best. } (12... Ng4) 13. Qxf2 Qxc4 14. Rac1?! { (0.46 → -0.23) Inaccuracy. h3 was best. } (14. h3 h6) 14... Qa6? { (-0.23 → 1.35) Mistake. Ng4 was best. } (14... Ng4 15. Qg3 Qc5+ 16. Kf1 f6 17. b4 Qc4+ 18. Ne2 Qa6 19. Qxg4 fxg5 20. Qxg5 Qxa3 21. Nd4) 15. e5?! { (1.35 → 0.24) Inaccuracy. h3 was best. } (15. h3 h6 16. Be3 Kh7 17. e5 Nd5 18. Nxd5 exd5 19. Rc7 Qe6 20. Bxa7 Re8 21. Bd4 Nb8) 15... Ne8?? { (0.24 → 2.91) Blunder. Ng4 was best. } (15... Ng4 16. Qd4 Ndxe5 17. Nxe5 Nxe5 18. Qxe5 f6 19. Bxf6 Qb6+ 20. Qe3 gxf6 21. Qxb6 axb6 22. Red1) 16. Qg3?? { (2.91 → 0.61) Blunder. Be7 was best. } (16. Be7 Qb6 17. Red1 Qxf2+ 18. Kxf2 Nb6 19. a4 Nc7 20. Bxf8 Kxf8 21. Rd8+ Ke7 22. Rh8 Bd7) 16... f6 17. exf6 Nexf6 18. Bh6?! { (1.19 → 0.58) Inaccuracy. a4 was best. } (18. a4) 18... Qb6+ 19. Kh1 Ne8 20. b4?! { (1.03 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Be3 was best. } (20. Be3 Qxb2 21. Qh3 Nb6 22. Ne4 Bd7 23. Rb1 Qa2 24. Ne5 Rf5) 20... Rf6?? { (0.00 → 4.11) Blunder. Qd6 was best. } (20... Qd6 21. Qxd6 Nxd6 22. Bg5 Nf6 23. Nd4 h6 24. Bh4 Bd7 25. Nxe6 Rfe8 26. Nc5 Bc6 27. Kg1) 21. Be3? { (4.11 → 2.23) Mistake. Nd5 was best. } (21. Nd5 Qd6 22. Nxf6+ Ndxf6 23. Ne5 b6 24. Rf1 Qe7 25. Bg5 Ba6 26. Rfd1 Rd8 27. Rxd8 Qxd8) 21... Qd6 22. Ne4 Qxg3 23. Nxf6+ Nexf6?! { (2.25 → 3.12) Inaccuracy. Ndxf6 was best. } (23... Ndxf6 24. hxg3 Bd7 25. Bd4 h6 26. b5 Bxb5 27. Rxe6 Kf7 28. Ree1 a6 29. Bxf6 gxf6 30. Nd4) 24. hxg3 Ne4?! { (3.16 → 3.98) Inaccuracy. Nf8 was best. } (24... Nf8 25. Bc5 Bd7 26. Bxf8 Kxf8 27. Rc7 b6 28. Ne5 Be8 29. Rb7 b5 30. Rf1 Kg8 31. Rc1) 25. Kh2?! { (3.98 → 2.85) Inaccuracy. Rc7 was best. } (25. Rc7 Ndf6 26. Bd4 b6 27. Kg1 h6 28. Be5 h5 29. Rd1 Ba6 30. Nd4 Ne8 31. Re7 Kf8) 25... Ndf6 26. Ne5 b6 27. Rc7 Nd6 28. Rec1 Nd5? { (2.87 → 4.82) Mistake. Ba6 was best. } (28... Ba6 29. Bf4 Nf5 30. b5 Bxb5 31. Rc8+ Rxc8 32. Rxc8+ Be8 33. g4 Nd6 34. Ra8 h6 35. Rxa7) 29. R7c6 Nb5?? { (4.78 → Mate in 2) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ba6 was best. } (29... Ba6 30. Rxd6 Nxe3 31. Rc7 Rf8 32. Rdd7 Nf5 33. Rxa7 Bb5 34. Rf7 Rxf7 35. Nxf7 Be8 36. Ng5) 30. Rxc8+ Rxc8 31. Rxc8# { White wins by checkmate. } 1-0
Spectator room
- gavalanche20
(4...dxc4) Estra!!! - Estructuralista
hey guys - Feet_Barbie
(8...O-O) Big match! go estra! - Estructuralista
i got to play the marshall gambit as planned but right off the bat he replied by taking the c pawn instead of the e pawn. - Estructuralista
but i think this is pretty comfortable for white - Estructuralista
i thought knight back to e8 was the obvious move here - Estructuralista
does he not see that one? - Estructuralista
or am I missing something, a killer blow, right after that? - Estructuralista
ok if he had played Rf7, i think it was a win for me - Estructuralista
but as its stands, looks like he defended succesfully - Estructuralista
unless im missing something special - Estructuralista
so knight g5, if he takes bishop i can take pawn with discovered check and that would be game over - Estructuralista
but of course he doesn't need to take bishop - Estructuralista
and otherwise it is just attacking e6, it's a pawn, but he can just defend it - Estructuralista
hey oh - Estructuralista
knight fork alert weeoo weeoo - Estructuralista
unfortunately it'd just be atrade false alarm - Estructuralista
or not, actually, cause the NxR comes with check :0 - Estructuralista
ok things are getting interesting, my pawns are not good but I'm up the exchange - Estructuralista
also low on time yikes - Estructuralista
why are knights so scary - Estructuralista
Man that was a rollercoaster for me