lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c5+0.22Nf3+0.2g6+0.43d4+0.4cxd4+0.64Nxd4+0.4Nc6+0.65c4+0.3Nf6+0.66Nxc6?!−0.2...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.6.Nc3d67.Be2[...]6...bxc6+0.17Nc3−0.2Bg7+0.28e5−0.2Ng8−0.39f4?!−0.9...Inaccuracy. Bf4 was best.9.Bf4Qa510.Be2[...]9...Nh6−1.210Bd3−1.5O-O−1.211O-O−1.6d6−1.712f5?!−2.6...Inaccuracy. h3 was best.12.h3Nf513.g4[...]12...Nxf5−2.413Bxf5−2.4Bxf5−2.314Rxf5?−4.7...Mistake. exd6 was best.14.exd6Qxd614...gxf5−4.415Qe1?!−5.8...Inaccuracy. exd6 was best.15.exd6Qb6+15...dxe5−5.816b3−7.4e4−6.717Bb2−7.5Qd4+−7.718Kh1−7.5Rad8−7.219h3−8.2Qd2−8.4
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/ERV5sJlx"] [Date "2019.12.05"] [White "rodeo"] [Black "sachetBasukala"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "ERV5sJlx"] [UTCDate "2019.12.05"] [UTCTime "19:03:32"] [WhiteElo "1887"] [BlackElo "1970"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-8"] [BlackRatingDiff "+20"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "B36"] [Opening "Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. c4 { B36 Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind } Nf6 6. Nxc6?! { (0.55 → -0.21) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (6. Nc3 d6 7. Be2 Nxd4 8. Qxd4 Be6 9. Be3 Bg7 10. O-O O-O) 6... bxc6 7. Nc3 Bg7 8. e5 Ng8 9. f4?! { (-0.27 → -0.87) Inaccuracy. Bf4 was best. } (9. Bf4 Qa5 10. Be2 Bxe5 11. Bxe5 Qxe5 12. O-O Nf6 13. Re1 O-O 14. Bf3 Qc5 15. Rc1 Re8) 9... Nh6 10. Bd3 O-O 11. O-O d6 12. f5?! { (-1.69 → -2.59) Inaccuracy. h3 was best. } (12. h3 Nf5 13. g4 Nd4 14. Bxg6 dxe5 15. Bb1 f5 16. Bxf5 Nxf5 17. Qxd8 Rxd8 18. gxf5 Bxf5) 12... Nxf5 13. Bxf5 Bxf5 14. Rxf5? { (-2.30 → -4.70) Mistake. exd6 was best. } (14. exd6 Qxd6) 14... gxf5 15. Qe1?! { (-4.45 → -5.85) Inaccuracy. exd6 was best. } (15. exd6 Qb6+) 15... dxe5 16. b3 e4 17. Bb2 Qd4+ 18. Kh1 Rad8 19. h3 Qd2 { White resigns. } 0-1
4 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
0 Blunders
61 Average centipawn loss
81%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
19 Average centipawn loss
95%Accuracy
  1. sachetBasukala I think I'm winning a pawn here
  2. sachetBasukala I'm thinking of playing, 16.. Qd4+ followed by Qg4.
  3. MrScribbles Go rodeo!