lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2e6+0.42d4+0.5d5+0.33exd5+0.2Qxd5+0.64Nc3+0.6Bb4+0.75Bd2?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Nf3 was best.5.Nf3b66.Bd3[...]5...Qxd40.06Nf30.0Qd8+0.17a3−0.1Be7?!+0.7Inaccuracy. Bd6 was best.7...Bd68Bc4+0.4a6+0.89O-O?−0.5...Mistake. Qe2 was best.9.Qe29...Nf6−0.510Qe2−0.7c5−0.311Rad1−0.5Qc7−0.512Ng5?!−1.4...Inaccuracy. Ne4 was best.12.Ne4b513.Nxf6+[...]12...O-O?−0.3Mistake. b5 was best.12...b513.Bd3Nc6[...]13Bxe6??−3.5...Blunder. Nce4 was best.13.Nce4Nc614.Nxf6+[...]13...Bxe6−3.514Nxe6−3.6fxe6−3.515Qxe6+−3.5Kh8−3.216Bg5−3.5Nc6−3.517Nd5−4.0Nxd5−4.118Bxe7?!−5.2...Inaccuracy. Rxd5 was best.18.Rxd5Bxg519.Rxg5[...]18...Ndxe7−5.219Rd7−5.2Qf4−5.3
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/5Lk884Ml"] [Date "2024.06.06"] [White "kmaddox86"] [Black "unspoke"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "5Lk884Ml"] [UTCDate "2024.06.06"] [UTCTime "14:58:25"] [WhiteElo "1709"] [BlackElo "1727"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-19"] [BlackRatingDiff "+16"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "C01"] [Opening "French Defense: Exchange Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 { C01 French Defense: Exchange Variation } Qxd5 4. Nc3 Bb4 5. Bd2?! { (0.66 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Nf3 was best. } (5. Nf3 b6 6. Bd3 Ba6 7. Bxa6 Nxa6 8. O-O Bxc3 9. bxc3 Nf6) 5... Qxd4 6. Nf3 Qd8 7. a3 Be7?! { (-0.10 → 0.69) Inaccuracy. Bd6 was best. } (7... Bd6) 8. Bc4 a6 9. O-O? { (0.75 → -0.51) Mistake. Qe2 was best. } (9. Qe2) 9... Nf6 10. Qe2 c5 11. Rad1 Qc7 12. Ng5?! { (-0.46 → -1.41) Inaccuracy. Ne4 was best. } (12. Ne4 b5 13. Nxf6+ Bxf6 14. Bd3 Bb7 15. Ng5 Nc6 16. c3 Ne7 17. Rfe1 c4) 12... O-O? { (-1.41 → -0.26) Mistake. b5 was best. } (12... b5 13. Bd3 Nc6 14. Qf3 Bb7 15. Rfe1 Nd4 16. Qh3 c4 17. Be4 Rd8 18. Bxb7) 13. Bxe6?? { (-0.26 → -3.51) Blunder. Nce4 was best. } (13. Nce4 Nc6 14. Nxf6+ Bxf6 15. Qe4 g6 16. c3 h6 17. Nf3 Kg7 18. Rfe1 b5) 13... Bxe6 14. Nxe6 fxe6 15. Qxe6+ Kh8 16. Bg5 Nc6 17. Nd5 Nxd5 18. Bxe7?! { (-4.10 → -5.16) Inaccuracy. Rxd5 was best. } (18. Rxd5 Bxg5 19. Rxg5 Nd4 20. Qe5 Qf7 21. Qd5 Qxd5 22. Rxd5 Rad8 23. Re5 c4) 18... Ndxe7 19. Rd7 Qf4 { White resigns. } 0-1
3 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
47 Average centipawn loss
75%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
1 Inaccuracy
1 Mistake
0 Blunders
20 Average centipawn loss
92%Accuracy
  1. unspoke (4) I remember somewhere around this Qg4 line I didn't like. The rest is fine. Maybe c4 also.
  2. unspoke (5) Qxd4 i've played in blitz, and this should be good
  3. unspoke (6) i like the pressure and unfamiliarity these exchange lines provide, it's also annoying like scandinavian and somewhat familiar to win
  4. unspoke (7) bxc3 is no good, bc3 has good diagonal then; ba5 then b4 expanding on qside is maybe ok but i don't like, so just retreat be7
  5. unspoke (8) q is limited in space though, so mb c5-qc7, keeping in mind a6-b5-bb7
  6. unspoke (9) need oo and get out k from center
  7. unspoke bd3 for white would be more dangerous
  8. unspoke (12) bxe6 doesnt work here, oo looks best
  9. unspoke (15) lsb problem solved and i have a n for a pawn, but still need to prove it in terms of practical play
  10. unspoke (16) rd7 defended, nc6 and i should be fine
  11. unspoke oh no rd7 )
  12. unspoke still tricky
  13. unspoke (19) losing b pawn, but i don't see any counterplay here
  14. unspoke Good game. I got scared a bit by thematical sac
  15. mkubecek The sacrifices looked cool but then white lacked pieces to actually attack the king.
  16. unspoke (6) * winawer variation
  17. unspoke Agree. Usually here should be qr fork and you get material back, but youre breaking through so in this situations is beneficial
  18. unspoke But i had the bishop to take the knight.
  19. unspoke It's similar to some bc4 najdorf lines, i believe
  20. unspoke I'm going to rest, good time of the day for you all.