lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.2d5+0.22c4+0.3e6+0.33Nc3+0.2Nf6+0.24cxd5+0.2exd5+0.35Bg5+0.2Be7+0.36e3+0.2O-O+0.27Nf3+0.1Ne4?+1.6Mistake. h6 was best.7...h68.Bh4c6[...]8Bxe7+2.1Nxc3+2.29Bxd8+2.2Nxd1+2.210Bxc7?+0.9...Mistake. Be7 was best.10.Be7Nxb211.Bxf8[...]10...Nxb2+0.911Rb1+1.1Na4+1.312Rb3+0.9Nb6+1.213Bd3+1.2h6?!+1.9Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.13...Nc614.Nd2Re8[...]14O-O+1.5N6d7+2.115Rfb1+1.9b6+2.016a4+1.5Ba6+1.417Bf5+1.3Nf6+1.318a5+1.3Bc4?!+2.3Inaccuracy. Nbd7 was best.18...Nbd719.h4Bc4[...]19R3b2?!+1.4...Inaccuracy. axb6 was best.19.axb6Bxb320.b7[...]19...b5+1.620Ne5+1.4Na6+1.921Nxc4+1.7Nxc7+1.722Nd6+1.7a6+1.823Rc2+1.9Nce8+2.524Nxe8?+1.2...Mistake. Nc8 was best.24.Nc8g625.Bh3[...]24...Rfxe8+1.325Rc7+0.8g6+1.026Bh3?!+0.3...Inaccuracy. Bd3 was best.26.Bd326...Kf8+0.727Rbc1+0.6Re7?+1.8Mistake. Ne4 was best.27...Ne428.Bc828Rc8+?!+0.8...Inaccuracy. Rxe7 was best.28.Rxe7Kxe729.Rc7+[...]28...Rxc8+0.929Rxc8++0.6Kg7+0.530Rc6+0.4Ra7?!+1.4Inaccuracy. b4 was best.30...b431.g3b3[...]31f3+1.1Rb7??+3.2Blunder. Ng8 was best.31...Ng832Rb6?+1.3...Mistake. Rxa6 was best.32.Rxa6Re733.Kf2[...]32...Ra7?!+2.2Inaccuracy. Rc7 was best.32...Rc733.Rxa6Rc1+[...]33Bc8+2.1Ne8+2.734Rxa6?!+1.9...Inaccuracy. Kf2 was best.34.Kf2Kf835.e4[...]34...Rxa6+2.335Bxa6+2.0Nc7+1.936Bb7+1.7b4+2.137Bc6+1.8b3+1.738Ba4+1.1b2+1.039Bc2+2.3Kf8+2.340Kf2+2.3Ke7+1.941Ke2+1.9Kd8?!+2.9Inaccuracy. Kd6 was best.41...Kd642.Kd242Kd2+2.7Nb5+2.443Bb1??−0.3...Blunder. e4 was best.43.e4dxe444.Bxe4[...]43...Kc7??+3.6Blunder. Na3 was best.43...Na344.Ba244Kc2+3.6Kb7?!+4.5Inaccuracy. Na3+ was best.44...Na3+45.Kxb2Nc4+[...]45Kxb2+4.4Ka6+4.146Bd3+4.1Kxa5+4.747Bxb5+4.5Kxb5+4.348e4+4.1Kc4+4.949exd5+5.7Kxd5+5.550Kc3+5.3f6+5.551g3+5.5f5+5.752f4+5.7g5+5.653fxg5+5.5hxg5+5.554h4??−0.4...Blunder. Kd3 was best.54.Kd3Kd655.Ke3[...]54...f4−0.655gxf4??−5.6...Blunder. h5 was best.55.h555...g4??+7.4Blunder. gxh4 was best.55...gxh456.f5h3[...]56Kd3+6.4g3+8.557Ke2?!+5.5...Inaccuracy. Ke3 was best.57.Ke357...Kxd4??#18Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ke4 was best.57...Ke458.h5Kxf4[...]58Kf3#18g2#1859Kxg2#17Kd5#1560Kg3#14Ke6#1461Kg4#13Kf7#1462Kf5#14Kg7#1263Ke6#11Kg6#1164f5+#10Kg7#865Ke7#13Kg8#766f6#6
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/2EG2KWYR"] [Date "2025.03.30"] [White "Business_Prof"] [Black "SrinivasBharathNK"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "2EG2KWYR"] [UTCDate "2025.03.30"] [UTCTime "15:01:52"] [WhiteElo "1647"] [BlackElo "1747"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+31"] [BlackRatingDiff "-13"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D35"] [Opening "Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Positional Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Bg5 { D35 Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Positional Variation } Be7 6. e3 O-O 7. Nf3 Ne4? { (0.12 → 1.60) Mistake. h6 was best. } (7... h6 8. Bh4 c6 9. Bd3 Ne4 10. Bxe7 Qxe7 11. O-O Bf5 12. Qb3) 8. Bxe7 Nxc3 9. Bxd8 Nxd1 10. Bxc7? { (2.17 → 0.86) Mistake. Be7 was best. } (10. Be7 Nxb2 11. Bxf8 Kxf8 12. Rc1 c6 13. Rc2 Na4 14. Bd3 Ke7 15. h4 h6) 10... Nxb2 11. Rb1 Na4 12. Rb3 Nb6 13. Bd3 h6?! { (1.24 → 1.89) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (13... Nc6 14. Nd2 Re8 15. O-O Na5 16. Rb4 Re6 17. Rfb1 Nc6 18. Rb5 Ne7 19. Rc1) 14. O-O N6d7 15. Rfb1 b6 16. a4 Ba6 17. Bf5 Nf6 18. a5 Bc4?! { (1.28 → 2.33) Inaccuracy. Nbd7 was best. } (18... Nbd7 19. h4 Bc4 20. R3b2 b5 21. Nd2 a6 22. f3 Rfc8 23. Bf4 g6 24. Bc2) 19. R3b2?! { (2.33 → 1.37) Inaccuracy. axb6 was best. } (19. axb6 Bxb3 20. b7 Na6 21. Bf4 Ba2 22. bxa8=Q Rxa8 23. Rb2 Bc4 24. h4 Ne4) 19... b5 20. Ne5 Na6 21. Nxc4 Nxc7 22. Nd6 a6 23. Rc2 Nce8 24. Nxe8? { (2.47 → 1.23) Mistake. Nc8 was best. } (24. Nc8 g6 25. Bh3 Kg7 26. f3 Nh7 27. Nb6 Ra7 28. Rc6 Nef6 29. Kf2 Re8) 24... Rfxe8 25. Rc7 g6 26. Bh3?! { (0.97 → 0.26) Inaccuracy. Bd3 was best. } (26. Bd3) 26... Kf8 27. Rbc1 Re7? { (0.57 → 1.82) Mistake. Ne4 was best. } (27... Ne4 28. Bc8) 28. Rc8+?! { (1.82 → 0.82) Inaccuracy. Rxe7 was best. } (28. Rxe7 Kxe7 29. Rc7+ Kd6 30. Rxf7 Ne4 31. Rg7 g5 32. Rh7 Rb8 33. Rxh6+ Kc7) 28... Rxc8 29. Rxc8+ Kg7 30. Rc6 Ra7?! { (0.38 → 1.35) Inaccuracy. b4 was best. } (30... b4 31. g3 b3 32. Rb6 Rc7 33. Rxb3 Rc1+ 34. Kg2 Ne4 35. Rb7 Kf6 36. Rb2) 31. f3 Rb7?? { (1.11 → 3.20) Blunder. Ng8 was best. } (31... Ng8) 32. Rb6? { (3.20 → 1.27) Mistake. Rxa6 was best. } (32. Rxa6 Re7 33. Kf2 Rc7 34. Rb6 Rc2+ 35. Kf1 Rb2 36. a6 Ra2 37. Bc8 Ra5) 32... Ra7?! { (1.27 → 2.15) Inaccuracy. Rc7 was best. } (32... Rc7 33. Rxa6 Rc1+ 34. Kf2 Rc2+ 35. Ke1 b4 36. Kd1 b3 37. Rb6 Ra2 38. a6) 33. Bc8 Ne8 34. Rxa6?! { (2.67 → 1.87) Inaccuracy. Kf2 was best. } (34. Kf2 Kf8 35. e4 dxe4 36. fxe4 Ra8 37. Bd7 Rd8 38. Bxe8 Rxe8 39. Ke3 Re6) 34... Rxa6 35. Bxa6 Nc7 36. Bb7 b4 37. Bc6 b3 38. Ba4 b2 39. Bc2 Kf8 40. Kf2 Ke7 41. Ke2 Kd8?! { (1.88 → 2.89) Inaccuracy. Kd6 was best. } (41... Kd6 42. Kd2) 42. Kd2 Nb5 43. Bb1?? { (2.36 → -0.33) Blunder. e4 was best. } (43. e4 dxe4 44. Bxe4 Na3 45. a6 Kc7 46. a7 f5 47. a8=Q fxe4 48. Qxe4 b1=Q) 43... Kc7?? { (-0.33 → 3.61) Blunder. Na3 was best. } (43... Na3 44. Ba2) 44. Kc2 Kb7?! { (3.55 → 4.49) Inaccuracy. Na3+ was best. } (44... Na3+ 45. Kxb2 Nc4+ 46. Kc3 Nxe3 47. g3 Nc4 48. Kb4 Kc6 49. Bd3 Nd2 50. f4) 45. Kxb2 Ka6 46. Bd3 Kxa5 47. Bxb5 Kxb5 48. e4 Kc4 49. exd5 Kxd5 50. Kc3 f6 51. g3 f5 52. f4 g5 53. fxg5 hxg5 54. h4?? { (5.54 → -0.37) Blunder. Kd3 was best. } (54. Kd3 Kd6 55. Ke3 Kd5 56. h3 Kc4 57. h4 f4+ 58. gxf4 gxh4 59. f5 h3) 54... f4 55. gxf4?? { (-0.56 → -5.63) Blunder. h5 was best. } (55. h5) 55... g4?? { (-5.63 → 7.42) Blunder. gxh4 was best. } (55... gxh4 56. f5 h3 57. f6 Ke6 58. d5+ Kxf6 59. d6 h2 60. d7 Ke7 61. d8=Q+) 56. Kd3 g3 57. Ke2?! { (8.53 → 5.51) Inaccuracy. Ke3 was best. } (57. Ke3) 57... Kxd4?? { (5.51 → Mate in 18) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Ke4 was best. } (57... Ke4 58. h5 Kxf4 59. h6 Ke4 60. h7 g2 61. Kf2 g1=Q+ 62. Kxg1 Kxd4 63. Kg2) 58. Kf3 g2 59. Kxg2 Kd5 60. Kg3 Ke6 61. Kg4 Kf7 62. Kf5 Kg7 63. Ke6 Kg6 64. f5+ Kg7 65. Ke7 Kg8 66. f6 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
Business_ProfSrinivasBharathNK
10
Business_Prof +31
5 Inaccuracies
3 Mistakes
3 Blunders
49 Average centipawn loss
81%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
SrinivasBharathNK −13
6 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
4 Blunders
63 Average centipawn loss
60%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation
  1. touzeboinetnicolas (31.f3) no bc8 ? seems quite good
  2. touzeboinetnicolas (31.f3) prevents Rb7 and threatens a6
  3. NameGoesInHere maybe worried about back rank issues after winning the a-pawn in that line?
  4. touzeboinetnicolas (31.f3) f3 would still be playable afterwards
  5. touzeboinetnicolas (31.f3) No clear way to infiltrate backrank while the rook is still on c6, no ?
  6. touzeboinetnicolas (31...Rb7) I was worried that this was coming
  7. touzeboinetnicolas (31...Rb7) Though now Rxa6 into Rb6 seems decent
  8. NameGoesInHere yeah you always have Rb6, and if Nd7 you can just trade the knight
  9. touzeboinetnicolas (31...Rb7) That's right
  10. NameGoesInHere black is really struggling to get the knight into play
  11. touzeboinetnicolas (31...Rb7) Classic knight jail situation
  12. NameGoesInHere yeah, great example of a bishop being better than a knight when there's action on both sides of the board
  13. touzeboinetnicolas (31...Rb7) Absolutely
  14. touzeboinetnicolas (33.Bc8) I was just watching a League game with 7 pawns on the light squares + knight versus dark squared bishop and some 5 pawns... brutal
  15. touzeboinetnicolas (33...Ne8) After Bxa6 b4 is playable by black I think
  16. touzeboinetnicolas (34.Rxa6) Hmm...
  17. touzeboinetnicolas (34.Rxa6) Rxa6 Bxa6 b4 Bd3 Nc7
  18. touzeboinetnicolas (35.Bxa6) Oh, Nc7 here already looks good
  19. touzeboinetnicolas (35.Bxa6) Nevermind
  20. touzeboinetnicolas (35...Nc7) Bb7 b4 a6
  21. touzeboinetnicolas (35...Nc7) I think black can promote
  22. NameGoesInHere i think white can stop it but needs to go Bc8 not Bb7 here
  23. NameGoesInHere Bc8 b4 Bd7 b3 Na4 b2 Bc2
  24. touzeboinetnicolas (35...Nc7) I see
  25. touzeboinetnicolas (35...Nc7) Just calculated that as well, good find
  26. NameGoesInHere maybe black can do something with the knight but really the kngiht is tied down to the a-pawn
  27. touzeboinetnicolas (36.Bb7) Ah
  28. touzeboinetnicolas (36.Bb7) Pawn promotes now
  29. touzeboinetnicolas (36.Bb7) If white plays a6 rather than bc6
  30. NameGoesInHere actually no I think it's still ok, b4 Bc6 then we transpose
  31. marty001 b4 a6 Nxa6 Bxd5 and white is fine
  32. touzeboinetnicolas (36...b4) Black doesn't have to take yet
  33. touzeboinetnicolas (36...b4) Can wait until pawn is promoted to take with knight
  34. NameGoesInHere well black doesn't have to play Nxa6 right, can wait till a8
  35. touzeboinetnicolas (36...b4) Yes, in which case black promotes
  36. touzeboinetnicolas (36...b4) If no Bc6 here I'm afraid black will take home the win
  37. NameGoesInHere phew
  38. touzeboinetnicolas (38...b2) Nb5 after Bc2
  39. NameGoesInHere yeah Nb5 was interesting but maybe the a-pawn promoted there
  40. touzeboinetnicolas (42.Kd2) Yes, didn't calculate all the way
  41. touzeboinetnicolas (42...Nb5) They are racing now
  42. touzeboinetnicolas (42...Nb5) Ah !
  43. touzeboinetnicolas (42...Nb5) Bb1 needed
  44. NameGoesInHere think Na3 instead of Kc7 might've worked, but too quick to calculate
  45. marty001 White can trade the Knight here
  46. touzeboinetnicolas (45...Ka6) Kc3
  47. touzeboinetnicolas (45...Ka6) Yes
  48. touzeboinetnicolas (51...f5) I don't know my theory well enough to say who wins this
  49. NameGoesInHere i think there might be some sort of zugzwag win here, but you have to count the pawn moves properly
  50. touzeboinetnicolas (51...f5) Yes, the h2-h4 push is confusing me
  51. touzeboinetnicolas (51...f5) Since it must be counted as well
  52. touzeboinetnicolas (51...f5) Ideally you want a 3 on 3 with tempo
  53. touzeboinetnicolas (51...f5) White looks better due to extra pawn and in-between moves since king can shuffle whereas black king cannot
  54. touzeboinetnicolas (52...g5) Not sure f4 is optimal
  55. NameGoesInHere yeah I think h4 was easier, but after g5 now I think fxg5 hxg5 h4 works?
  56. NameGoesInHere hm maybe not
  57. touzeboinetnicolas (53...hxg5) Black promotes first in that case
  58. touzeboinetnicolas (53...hxg5) Though still looks like a draw is very possible
  59. NameGoesInHere h4 gxh4 gxh4 f4 Kd3 f3 h5! f2 Ke2 and white stops the pawn, while black can't stop both?
  60. NameGoesInHere probably very wrong though
  61. NameGoesInHere maybe black can start with Ke4 and you get Q+1 vs Q and I'm not good enough at endgames to evaulate that at a glance
  62. touzeboinetnicolas (54.h4) That looks sound
  63. touzeboinetnicolas (54...f4) wow
  64. NameGoesInHere oh gosh, missed that
  65. touzeboinetnicolas (54...f4) Me too
  66. touzeboinetnicolas (54...f4) Looks better than both our options at first glance
  67. touzeboinetnicolas (55.gxf4) gxh4 here I believe
  68. touzeboinetnicolas (55.gxf4) White king is too far away
  69. touzeboinetnicolas (55.gxf4) I think Kd3 was needed rather than f4
  70. touzeboinetnicolas (55.gxf4) On move 52*
  71. touzeboinetnicolas (55...g4) Oh...
  72. touzeboinetnicolas (55...g4) This is so confusing hahaha
  73. NameGoesInHere maybe black didn't like gxh4 f5?
  74. touzeboinetnicolas (56...g3) Ke5 neutralizes that
  75. touzeboinetnicolas (57.Ke2) Game is lost now
  76. NameGoesInHere Ke5 was illegal after gxh4 f5 :)
  77. touzeboinetnicolas (65.Ke7) Ah, I missed that. I think you can achieve a similar result with Kd6 though
  78. NameGoesInHere yeah I think black was still winning, but non-trivially
  79. touzeboinetnicolas Yes
  80. touzeboinetnicolas Let's check now !
  81. touzeboinetnicolas Yes, gxh4 was indeed necessary
  82. touzeboinetnicolas That's too bad, very good play in the endgame from both sides overall
  83. NameGoesInHere ah after f4, h5 got to a drawn queen endgame
  84. touzeboinetnicolas Ok I see
  85. SrinivasBharathNK i missed a draw
  86. SrinivasBharathNK yes
  87. touzeboinetnicolas What move are you looking at ?
  88. NameGoesInHere 43...Na3 I think?
  89. SrinivasBharathNK g*f4
  90. NameGoesInHere although that gets to an interesting endgame with two pawns for a knight, not obviously a draw
  91. touzeboinetnicolas gxh4 looks to be a win to me
  92. touzeboinetnicolas But yes, hard to see clearly for Na3 especially since there is the threat of the pawn promoting
  93. NameGoesInHere yeah definitely chances for both sides in that line