45:00
45:00
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
in local browser
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"]
[Site "https://lichess.org/1W8o6heb"]
[Date "2024.01.21"]
[White "Estructuralista"]
[Black "masedog91"]
[Result "1-0"]
[GameId "1W8o6heb"]
[UTCDate "2024.01.21"]
[UTCTime "10:58:31"]
[WhiteElo "1859"]
[BlackElo "1861"]
[WhiteRatingDiff "+20"]
[BlackRatingDiff "-18"]
[Variant "Standard"]
[TimeControl "2700+45"]
[ECO "A13"]
[Opening "English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Bogoljubow Defense"]
[Termination "Normal"]
[Annotator "lichess.org"]
1. c4 e6 2. g3 d5 3. Bg2 Nf6 4. Nf3 Bd6 { A13 English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Bogoljubow Defense } 5. O-O O-O 6. b3 Nbd7 7. Bb2 c5 8. e3 Rb8 9. Nc3 a6 10. Qe2?! { (0.82 → -0.01) Inaccuracy. cxd5 was best. } (10. cxd5 Nxd5 11. Ne4 Be7 12. d4 b6 13. Ne5 Qc7 14. Rc1 f5 15. Nxd7 Bxd7 16. Nd2 Bf6) 10... Re8?! { (-0.01 → 0.58) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (10... b5) 11. Rfe1?! { (0.58 → -0.01) Inaccuracy. cxd5 was best. } (11. cxd5) 11... Qc7 12. d4 dxc4 13. bxc4 b5? { (-0.05 → 1.28) Mistake. cxd4 was best. } (13... cxd4 14. exd4) 14. cxb5 axb5?! { (1.26 → 2.00) Inaccuracy. Qa5 was best. } (14... Qa5) 15. Nxb5 Qb6 16. Nxd6 Qxd6 17. Rab1? { (2.00 → 0.82) Mistake. dxc5 was best. } (17. dxc5 Qxc5 18. a4 Qa5 19. Nd4 Ba6 20. Bc3 Qb6 21. Qd2 Rec8 22. a5 Qd6 23. Rec1 h6) 17... cxd4 18. Nxd4 Bb7 19. Nb5 Qe7?? { (1.00 → 3.41) Blunder. Qa6 was best. } (19... Qa6 20. Bxb7 Rxb7 21. a4 h5 22. Rec1 e5 23. Qc2 Reb8 24. Ba3 h4 25. Bd6 Rd8 26. Rd1) 20. Ba3 Nc5 21. Bxb7?! { (4.26 → 2.90) Inaccuracy. Bxc5 was best. } (21. Bxc5 Qxc5 22. Rec1 Qf8 23. Nc7 Re7 24. Bxb7 Qd8 25. Nxe6 Rxe6 26. Bf3 Reb6 27. Rxb6 Qxb6) 21... Rxb7 22. Nd4?! { (3.03 → 1.96) Inaccuracy. Rec1 was best. } (22. Rec1 Nfd7 23. Bb4 h5 24. h4 Rc8 25. a4 Ne5 26. Rc3 Rd7 27. Rbc1 Qd8 28. Rxc5 Rxc5) 22... Rxb1 23. Rxb1 Qa7 24. Nb5 Qe7? { (1.72 → 3.24) Mistake. Qb6 was best. } (24... Qb6 25. Qc2 Nfd7 26. Nd4 Qa7 27. Bb4 Qa4 28. Qxa4 Nxa4 29. Rc1 Nab6 30. e4 Ne5 31. Rc7) 25. Rc1 Rc8 26. Bb4 Nfd7 27. Qc4 Ne5?! { (2.74 → 3.84) Inaccuracy. h6 was best. } (27... h6 28. Qd4) 28. Bxc5 Qc7?! { (3.82 → 5.51) Inaccuracy. Qd7 was best. } (28... Qd7 29. Qb3 h5 30. Nd6 Rc6 31. Qc3 Ng6 32. e4 h4 33. a4 h3 34. a5 e5 35. Kf1) 29. Nxc7 Nxc4 30. Rxc4 Rxc7 { Black resigns. } 1-0
Spectator room
- Oachkatzerlschwoaf
Go get him Mase! - d0wnh0me
(4...Bd6) Let's go Estructuralista! - MilsBees
Go Estru! - Estructuralista
so far he hasn't dealt at all with that lsq - Estructuralista
well it looks like soon the lsq will activate - Estructuralista
so i think Nxb5 he might be thinking Ba6, but of courrse 'id be hitting his queen too - Estructuralista
so then Nxc7 Bxe2 Nxe8 and then whether he takes my knight or retreats the bishop i'd be up the exchange - Estructuralista
ok good, pawn up now - Estructuralista
Ba3 could be a move but the c pawn is twice defended so that if Ra8 i would just need to retreat - Estructuralista
maybe a rook move - CheckMateDTB
Great start Estructuralista, pair of bishop, pawn up, great position. - Estructuralista
so Ba3 Qd8 Nd6 Rf8 Nxb8? - Estructuralista
other chance is he blocks with Nc5, I guess Rec1 could be the option then - Estructuralista
so the only but is whether Ba6 would work for white eventually here - Estructuralista
i can just take his bishop first, my knight is defended twice - Estructuralista
so Red1 to set up a fork with the knight doesn't work cause if i move the knight, the rook in d will have to recapture in the event of he - Estructuralista
taking my rook in b - Estructuralista
it's best to move the knight now - Estructuralista
Nb5 is a move but im not sure it accomplishes anything - Estructuralista
other option is simply to take the knight - Estructuralista
so that's a double pin right? - Estructuralista
only now I gotta figure out how to exploit it - Estructuralista
if i add the queen as an attacker, he'll play Nfd7 - Estructuralista
but what if i play Qd2? - Estructuralista
maybe it's a different plan. What if Bb4 followed by a push of the a pawn? - Estructuralista
gotta take advantage of the extra pawn - Estructuralista
ok so im looking at two possible moves here - Estructuralista
Qd4 which looks pretty strong at first glance - Estructuralista
or simply Bxc5 which i think wins a piece but im not sure - CheckMateDTB
Wow, congrats Estructuralista ! - Estructuralista
Thanks! We did it! - CheckMateDTB
It was a great match. were 1-0. Very nice game you played well. - Estructuralista
Yess, thankfully at the end I had that backrank mate threat to free the bishop right away but still I think that my king would have it - Estructuralista
covered either way - Estructuralista
This lenghtens my wining streak in the league! Now it's 12 in a row - CheckMateDTB
Yes the backrank mate threat + the double pin made the difference in the end. Only one mistake and I dont understand it. Flawless. - Estructuralista
lol yeah, me neither - Estructuralista
I felt pretty comfortably throught out, black took a long time to even move their lsq, and then they were pretty cramped, i had the space - Estructuralista
advantage - CheckMateDTB
Ah ok perhaps ure mistake is maybe because he could have created a past pawn on c4. - CheckMateDTB
But whatever. Yes you had a great position from the start. - CheckMateDTB
Oh no I'm wrong. - CheckMateDTB
Tomorrow is round 2 then... - Estructuralista
Yeah if he pushed i could just have taken with my queen and be two pawns up - Estructuralista
Qd4 on move 28 would hav e been a humongous mistake, the kind that loses a won game